Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Virginia
(Rep. Robert Wittman)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 481
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman) totaled $6,539,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cloverfield Enterprises | Champlain, VA 22438 | $288,877 |
| 2 | Philip Minor Farms II | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $149,084 |
| 3 | Herbert Wilkerson & Son Inc | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $128,497 |
| 4 | Beaver Dam Farm Inc | Little Plymouth, VA 23091 | $119,814 |
| 5 | Franklin Parker III | Walkerton, VA 23177 | $117,397 |
| 6 | Haile Farm LLC | Dunnsville, VA 22454 | $115,010 |
| 7 | James M Fogg Farms Inc | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $114,392 |
| 8 | B & S Farms Inc | Montross, VA 22520 | $106,055 |
| 9 | Harris Farms Inc | Heathsville, VA 22473 | $100,923 |
| 10 | Brooks Farm LLC | Tappahannock, VA 22560 | $100,778 |
| 11 | Robert B Gillions & Son LLC | Hague, VA 22469 | $100,018 |
| 12 | Castle Thunder LLC | Caret, VA 22436 | $82,210 |
| 13 | Welch Farms Inc | Kilmarnock, VA 22482 | $80,349 |
| 14 | Fairview Farms Inc | Kinsale, VA 22488 | $78,326 |
| 15 | Ellis Farms Inc | Champlain, VA 22438 | $75,946 |
| 16 | W H Bray & Sons Incorporated | Urbanna, VA 23175 | $70,582 |
| 17 | Ridgefield Farms LLC | Lancaster, VA 22503 | $69,520 |
| 18 | Haynie Farms LLC | Heathsville, VA 22473 | $69,465 |
| 19 | David A Hudnall Sr | Heathsville, VA 22473 | $67,959 |
| 20 | Thomas O Longest Jr | King Queen Ch, VA 23085 | $67,352 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf