Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 2nd District of Virginia (Rep. Elaine Luria), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 49
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 2nd District of Virginia (Rep. Elaine Luria) totaled $265,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ray & Joyce Newman | Virginia Beach, VA 23455 | $37,058 |
2 | Mark M Newman | Eastville, VA 23347 | $28,098 |
3 | Yaros Farms Inc | Cape Charles, VA 23310 | $24,538 |
4 | Seabay Farms LLC | Belle Haven, VA 23306 | $19,197 |
5 | Yaros Enterprise LLC | Cape Charles, VA 23310 | $16,512 |
6 | Atkinson Farms Inc | Painter, VA 23420 | $15,490 |
7 | H Bruce Richardson Jr | Capeville, VA 23313 | $12,775 |
8 | Deer Path Farms LLC | Machipongo, VA 23405 | $12,458 |
9 | Shockley Farms | Cape Charles, VA 23310 | $11,648 |
10 | B And D Farms | Exmore, VA 23350 | $10,974 |
11 | Long Grain And Livestock | Cape Charles, VA 23310 | $9,568 |
12 | Steve W Sturgis | Eastville, VA 23347 | $9,210 |
13 | Sturgis Farms Inc | Painter, VA 23420 | $6,556 |
14 | Ralph W Dodd | Eastville, VA 23347 | $6,002 |
15 | Hoge A Floyd III | Belle Haven, VA 23306 | $5,250 |
16 | Robert Scott Jr | Cheriton, VA 23316 | $4,987 |
17 | John W Culver | Capeville, VA 23313 | $4,889 |
18 | Ronald P Bailey Jr | Cheriton, VA 23316 | $2,558 |
19 | William S Floyd | Machipongo, VA 23405 | $2,550 |
20 | W R Snyder Jr | Nassawadox, VA 23413 | $2,420 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>