Total Conservation Programs in 5th District of Virginia (Rep. Denver Riggleman), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 250
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 5th District of Virginia (Rep. Denver Riggleman) totaled $237,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Hill View Farms Inc | Danville, VA 24540 | $1,363 |
42 | Charles H Moseley III | Waverly, VA 23890 | $1,350 |
43 | David A Landrum Sr | South Boston, VA 24592 | $1,289 |
44 | John F Bosiger Jr | Halifax, VA 24558 | $1,227 |
45 | Edith B Adams | Alton, VA 24520 | $1,214 |
46 | David Glenn Ferguson | Nathalie, VA 24577 | $1,202 |
47 | Roger P Jefferson | Chatham, VA 24531 | $1,197 |
48 | Logan Thomas Mills | Callands, VA 24530 | $1,180 |
49 | James Michael Williams | Kenbridge, VA 23944 | $1,152 |
50 | James M Martin | Altavista, VA 24517 | $1,131 |
51 | S Stone Gregory III | Java, VA 24565 | $1,110 |
52 | J C Satterfield Jr | Halifax, VA 24558 | $1,096 |
53 | Johnny K Long | Kenbridge, VA 23944 | $1,073 |
54 | Byron F Blair | Lynchburg, VA 24502 | $1,040 |
55 | James Ray Wood | Danville, VA 24540 | $1,037 |
56 | Gerald C Burnett | South Boston, VA 24592 | $1,022 |
57 | Betty R Petty | Red House, VA 23963 | $1,010 |
58 | Steve A Ortlip | Kenbridge, VA 23944 | $970 |
59 | Joanne W Andrews | Chase City, VA 23924 | $962 |
60 | Edwin Atkinson Chaney III | South Boston, VA 24592 | $925 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”