Total Commodity Programs in 4th District of Washington (Rep. Dan Newhouse), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 420
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 4th District of Washington (Rep. Dan Newhouse) totaled $15,992,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Manterola Hay Inc | Pasco, WA 99301 | $111,697 |
42 | Dan Maur Farms Inc | Othello, WA 99344 | $106,229 |
43 | Cherry Hill Farms LLC | Mesa, WA 99343 | $103,897 |
44 | Circle J Orchards LLC | Othello, WA 99344 | $101,309 |
45 | Calaway Company Inc | Pasco, WA 99301 | $98,020 |
46 | Sickle G Ranch Inc | Eltopia, WA 99330 | $90,557 |
47 | Grain Acres Inc | Connell, WA 99326 | $87,463 |
48 | Jed A Pauley | Mesa, WA 99343 | $86,585 |
49 | Alyssa D Pauley | Mesa, WA 99343 | $86,585 |
50 | Zurcher Dairy LLC | Mesa, WA 99343 | $83,691 |
51 | Bauman Farms Inc | Pasco, WA 99301 | $82,500 |
52 | Jeneroso Garza Jr | Othello, WA 99344 | $81,394 |
53 | Chad R Mastre | Connell, WA 99326 | $78,506 |
54 | Rod Rottinghaus Farms LLC | Pasco, WA 99301 | $76,451 |
55 | Van Hollebeke Livestock Joint Venture | Pasco, WA 99301 | $76,170 |
56 | Gledhill Farms Inc | Mesa, WA 99343 | $75,644 |
57 | Manton Bailie | Mesa, WA 99343 | $75,638 |
58 | Chiawana Vista Fruit & Crop Inc | Pasco, WA 99301 | $73,333 |
59 | Shawver Farms LLC | Connell, WA 99326 | $72,967 |
60 | Nueva Vida Nursery LLC | Mesa, WA 99343 | $70,198 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”