Total Commodity Programs in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,967
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers) totaled $23,954,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Tetrick Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $95,018 |
42 | Hangman Creek Products Lp | Latah, WA 99018 | $94,737 |
43 | Kaelin Farms Inc | Spokane, WA 99217 | $92,937 |
44 | Joneco Farms | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $92,139 |
45 | Kenneth W Beale | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $91,470 |
46 | Hg Etc LLC | Dayton, WA 99328 | $90,026 |
47 | Big Rock Farms Inc | Valleyford, WA 99036 | $89,893 |
48 | Klaveano Ranches Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $89,083 |
49 | Greene Ridge Farms | Asotin, WA 99402 | $86,894 |
50 | Lambert L & L Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $85,658 |
51 | Just Farms, LLC | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $85,151 |
52 | Double F Ranch Inc | Rockford, WA 99030 | $82,656 |
53 | Dutch Flat Angus LLC | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $82,526 |
54 | Mark Lashaw Farms Inc | Rockford, WA 99030 | $81,644 |
55 | Mpj Farms Inc | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $80,875 |
56 | Mahn Farms Inc | Valleyford, WA 99036 | $80,783 |
57 | Becker Ranch | Genesee, ID 83832 | $80,447 |
58 | Rolling Hills Farms Inc | Spangle, WA 99031 | $80,444 |
59 | Ingram Farms Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $80,436 |
60 | Trevor Smith | Cheney, WA 99004 | $80,176 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”