Farm Subsidy information
5th District of Washington
(Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers)
Total Subsidies in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 8,490
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers) totaled $777,626,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Thorn Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $1,763,857 |
42 | Hinchliff & Sons Inc | Broomfield, CO 80023 | $1,724,393 |
43 | Sam Heitstuman | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $1,688,368 |
44 | Randy R Kausche | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $1,642,956 |
45 | Ingram Farms Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $1,621,745 |
46 | Tetrick Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $1,604,122 |
47 | Gary & Kayleen Bye Jv | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $1,538,344 |
48 | Richard D & Judy C Hastings Ptrs | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $1,531,311 |
49 | Robert D & Resa Cox | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $1,515,308 |
50 | Dixon Land And Livestock Joint Venture | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $1,499,459 |
51 | Beale Meadow Creek Ranch Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $1,489,929 |
52 | Peola Farms Inc | Juliaetta, ID 83535 | $1,463,250 |
53 | G M Farms | Latah, WA 99018 | $1,461,021 |
54 | Fitzgerald Farms Inc | Cheney, WA 99004 | $1,459,604 |
55 | Roger Dye | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $1,457,264 |
56 | C2s Farms Inc | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $1,446,747 |
57 | Wp Farms Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $1,440,382 |
58 | Rod Hostetler | Asotin, WA 99402 | $1,401,676 |
59 | View Point Farm Inc | Rockford, WA 99030 | $1,393,583 |
60 | Warren Farms Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $1,393,123 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”