Total Conservation Programs in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,197

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers) totaled $252,448,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2021
1Broughton Land CoDayton, WA 99328$5,633,575
2Cochran PartnershipPullman, WA 99163$2,644,008
3F & R FarmsStarbuck, WA 99359$2,484,337
4T-star PartnershipDayton, WA 99328$2,029,450
5Barker Enterprises Joint VentureDayton, WA 99328$2,003,672
6Klaveano Brothers JvPomeroy, WA 99347$1,835,689
7Mcgreevy BrothersPomeroy, WA 99347$1,786,344
8Curt & Julie Claassen JvPomeroy, WA 99347$1,578,155
9Ferrell & LuvaasPomeroy, WA 99347$1,566,141
10Alliance Escrow & TitleRigby, ID 83442$1,352,171
11Mittelstaedt Farms IncPost Falls, ID 83854$1,265,884
12Robert D & Resa CoxPomeroy, WA 99347$1,237,960
13Fitzgerald Farms IncCheney, WA 99004$1,217,413
14Talbott Farms IncDayton, WA 99328$1,211,452
15Scheibe FarmsAnatone, WA 99401$1,186,077
16Dodge HeirsLacrosse, WA 99143$1,173,652
17Hinchliff & Sons IncBroomfield, CO 80023$1,170,250
18State Of Wash DnrEllensburg, WA 98926$1,161,839
19C & S FarmsPomeroy, WA 99347$1,161,629
20Keith AusmanAsotin, WA 99402$1,139,379

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag