Total Commodity Programs in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 6,965

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers) totaled $435,509,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2021
1Broughton Land CoDayton, WA 99328$10,777,467
2Klaveano Brothers JvPomeroy, WA 99347$5,330,233
3Double D FarmsDayton, WA 99328$3,376,678
4Archer FarmsDayton, WA 99328$3,103,341
5Emtman Bros Farms JvValleyford, WA 99036$2,912,028
6Spokane Hutterian Brethren IncReardan, WA 99029$2,885,931
7Mead RanchDayton, WA 99328$2,814,432
8Penner Farms Joint VentureWaitsburg, WA 99361$2,748,753
9Randy James And Terri James Dba James FarmsDayton, WA 99328$2,435,230
10Barker Enterprises Joint VentureDayton, WA 99328$2,314,504
11Kenneth & Debbie Ledgerwood JvPomeroy, WA 99347$2,252,995
12Ely RanchesWaitsburg, WA 99361$2,099,498
13Blachly & SonsPomeroy, WA 99347$1,900,917
14T & T JvFairfield, WA 99012$1,763,420
15Thorn IncDayton, WA 99328$1,568,030
16Carlton Farms IncDayton, WA 99328$1,567,947
17C & S FarmsPomeroy, WA 99347$1,554,181
18Kaelin Farms IncSpokane, WA 99217$1,553,046
19Klaveano Ranches IncPomeroy, WA 99347$1,521,822
20Flerchinger RanchesPomeroy, WA 99347$1,500,630

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag