Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 2nd District of Wisconsin (Rep. Mark Pocan), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 79
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 2nd District of Wisconsin (Rep. Mark Pocan) totaled $495,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Neski Dairy LLC | Monroe, WI 53566 | $37,428 |
2 | Spotts Grain Farms Inc | Monroe, WI 53566 | $31,151 |
3 | Brugger Dairy LLC | Monroe, WI 53566 | $30,981 |
4 | Wenger Farms LLC | Brodhead, WI 53520 | $25,453 |
5 | Southern Ridge Cow Palace LLC | Monroe, WI 53566 | $21,213 |
6 | Katherine B Falk | Monroe, WI 53566 | $19,147 |
7 | Timothy And Nancy Schmidt | Monroe, WI 53566 | $18,930 |
8 | Mary T Schmidt Sp | Monroe, WI 53566 | $16,234 |
9 | Weckland Dairy LLC | Monroe, WI 53566 | $16,056 |
10 | Hickory Hill Dairy LLC | Juda, WI 53550 | $15,657 |
11 | Trent J Hendrickson | Blanchardville, WI 53516 | $12,655 |
12 | Lois J Nuckles | Browntown, WI 53522 | $12,204 |
13 | Tamara J Zweifel | Albany, WI 53502 | $12,139 |
14 | Jas Farms Inc | Albany, WI 53502 | $10,785 |
15 | Daniel R Austin | Juda, WI 53550 | $10,213 |
16 | B & C Bauman Dairy Inc | Juda, WI 53550 | $10,189 |
17 | , | $9,880 | |
18 | Mill Hill Dairy LLC | Juda, WI 53550 | $9,636 |
19 | , | $9,352 | |
20 | Gough Farms LLC | Monroe, WI 53566 | $9,117 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>