Total Conservation Programs in 7th District of Wisconsin (Rep. Sean Duffy), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 680
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 7th District of Wisconsin (Rep. Sean Duffy) totaled $3,185,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Daigle Brothers Hunting Shack Inc | Wausau, WI 54403 | $14,782 |
42 | Betty Kulbeck | Webster, WI 54893 | $14,643 |
43 | Phil Lindeman | Shell Lake, WI 54871 | $14,412 |
44 | Scott A Lybert | Tony, WI 54563 | $14,356 |
45 | James D Bryce | Cumberland, WI 54829 | $13,775 |
46 | Ernest R Vanselus Jr | Shell Lake, WI 54871 | $13,773 |
47 | David Reinsch | Woodville, WI 54028 | $13,022 |
48 | Morgan R Peck | High Bridge, WI 54846 | $12,978 |
49 | Caryl L Peck | High Bridge, WI 54846 | $12,978 |
50 | Delores Fortuna | Galena, IL 61036 | $12,958 |
51 | Jerry L Rydberg | Shell Lake, WI 54871 | $12,954 |
52 | Bennett E Lee Jr | Hayward, WI 54843 | $12,489 |
53 | Kadlec Farms Inc | Stone Lake, WI 54876 | $12,305 |
54 | Fuernot Farms Inc | Sarona, WI 54870 | $12,026 |
55 | Holoubek Farms Inc | Phillips, WI 54555 | $11,938 |
56 | Alex Kurak | Saint Paul, MN 55116 | $11,845 |
57 | Ray H Hogue | Deltona, FL 32738 | $11,750 |
58 | Alan D Manson | Exeland, WI 54835 | $11,741 |
59 | Duane J Taylor | Bruce, WI 54819 | $11,715 |
60 | Mary J Stenberg | Mason, WI 54856 | $11,634 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”