Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 2nd District of West Virginia (Rep. Alex Mooney), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 520

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 2nd District of West Virginia (Rep. Alex Mooney) totaled $4,081,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
21Jason W MagahaCharles Town, WV 25414$48,016
22Joseph A. Ware, III - Green Horizons Turf FarmKearneysville, WV 25430$47,676
23Dan W FolkHedgesville, WV 25427$45,148
24Oakwood Farm LLCCharles Town, WV 25414$44,402
25A B G Orchard IncBerkeley Springs, WV 25411$43,448
26Woodside Land And Cattle Management Company, LLCClear Brook, VA 22624$42,968
27Roberta V Mong - Rolling Acres FarmMartinsburg, WV 25404$42,225
28Thomas E LefevreBunker Hill, WV 25413$40,058
29Cline's Farm Lp LlpClear Brook, VA 22624$39,584
30R Z Bane IncSummit Point, WV 25446$37,704
31Timothy Neill Banks - Alta Vista FarmHarpers Ferry, WV 25425$37,447
32John Nicholas Kerchval - Summit FarmsHarpers Ferry, WV 25425$33,144
33Jerry E Saunders JrSpencer, WV 25276$32,229
34Greystone Farm LLCShenandoah Junction, WV 25442$30,680
35James W ButlerInwood, WV 25428$29,507
36Mark S Glascock IIBerkeley Springs, WV 25411$29,444
37Linton Brothers IncMartinsburg, WV 25403$29,443
38William Nicholas Snyder-shenstone FarmSummit Point, WV 25446$29,358
39Stewart W WareRanson, WV 25438$28,696
40Henry B Davenport IIICharles Town, WV 25414$26,562

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag