Production Flexibility Program in 2nd District of West Virginia (Rep. Alex Mooney), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 447

Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in 2nd District of West Virginia (Rep. Alex Mooney) totaled $5,492,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Production Flexibility Program
1995-2021
1Burns FarmCharles Town, WV 25414$205,114
2Avon Hill Farms IncCharles Town, WV 25414$184,989
3Harry M KableCharles Town, WV 25414$163,175
4Hy-crest Farms LLCKearneysville, WV 25430$140,450
5Oakwood Farm LLCCharles Town, WV 25414$133,492
6Estate Of W O LloydCharles Town, WV 25414$124,450
7Lyle C Tabb & Sons IncKearneysville, WV 25430$120,954
8Elmwood FarmCharles Town, WV 25414$117,077
9Stanley W Dunn JrCharles Town, WV 25414$112,074
10William A KnightenShepherdstown, WV 25443$109,618
11Nancy & Doug Stolipher And Mark SRippon, WV 25441$103,275
12Riggs & Stiles IncCharles Town, WV 25414$94,483
13R Z Bane IncSummit Point, WV 25446$81,476
14Drilake Farm IncCharles Town, WV 25414$80,511
15Adams BrosRippon, WV 25441$75,264
16Michael G RinerShenandoah Junction, WV 25442$70,271
17Federal Hill Farm IncCharles Town, WV 25414$69,423
18James T Blue & Sons IncShenandoah Junction, WV 25442$68,828
19Zigler IncCharles Town, WV 25414$66,935
20T L Magaha & Sons IncCharles Town, WV 25414$65,713

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag