Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of West Virginia (Rep. Alex Mooney), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,281
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of West Virginia (Rep. Alex Mooney) totaled $40,874,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Appalachian Orchard Co | Martinsburg, WV 25403 | $460,590 |
| 22 | George S Orr & Sons Inc | Martinsburg, WV 25402 | $455,567 |
| 23 | Shady Grove Farm LLC | Rippon, WV 25441 | $447,876 |
| 24 | Federal Hill Farm Inc | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $410,024 |
| 25 | W O Lloyd Farms LLC | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $400,577 |
| 26 | Lewis Brothers Orchards Inc | Martinsburg, WV 25403 | $390,457 |
| 27 | William A Knighten | Shepherdstown, WV 25443 | $386,032 |
| 28 | Harry M Kable | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $378,726 |
| 29 | Francis W Daniel | Shenandoah Junction, WV 25442 | $375,786 |
| 30 | William Nicholas Snyder-shenstone Farm | Summit Point, WV 25446 | $347,106 |
| 31 | Henry B Davenport III | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $328,659 |
| 32 | Taylor Farms LLC | Inwood, WV 25428 | $291,768 |
| 33 | Adams Bros | Rippon, WV 25441 | $289,949 |
| 34 | Thomas E Lefevre | Bunker Hill, WV 25413 | $269,698 |
| 35 | T L Magaha & Sons Inc | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $259,111 |
| 36 | B & G Orchards Inc | Martinsburg, WV 25403 | $258,471 |
| 37 | James W Butler | Inwood, WV 25428 | $245,746 |
| 38 | Roberta V Mong - Rolling Acres Farm | Martinsburg, WV 25404 | $235,274 |
| 39 | Rolling Acres Farm | Martinsburg, WV 25404 | $230,861 |
| 40 | Keith Edward Mercer | Frederick, MD 21701 | $224,058 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf