SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program payments in the United States totaled $1.2 million in 2016
Counties in the United States Receiving SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program payments, 2016
Rank |
County |
SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 2016 | Pct of Total | Running Percentage |
1 | Greene County, North Carolina | $309,746 | 26.5% | 26.5% |
2 | Antelope County, Nebraska | $156,863 | 13.4% | 39.9% |
3 | Washington County, North Carolina | $108,914 | 9.3% | 49.2% |
4 | Chouteau County, Montana | $100,000 | 8.5% | 57.7% |
5 | Cavalier County, North Dakota | $95,055 | 8.1% | 65.9% |
6 | Calhoun County, Texas | $88,225 | 7.5% | 73.4% |
7 | Stanton County, Nebraska | $82,007 | 7.0% | 80.4% |
8 | Thomas County, Kansas | $71,090 | 6.1% | 86.5% |
9 | Refugio County, Texas | $64,467 | 5.5% | 92.0% |
10 | Quay County, New Mexico | $56,624 | 4.8% | 96.8% |
11 | Caldwell County, Texas | $39,766 | 3.4% | 100.2% |
12 | Benton County, Minnesota | $36,929 | 3.2% | 103.4% |
13 | Mayaguez Municipio, Puerto Rico | $36,196 | 3.1% | 106.5% |
14 | Barnes County, North Dakota | $33,205 | 2.8% | 109.3% |
15 | Bristol County, Massachusetts | $32,252 | 2.8% | 112.1% |
16 | Dade County, Florida | $24,118 | 2.1% | 114.1% |
17 | Lares Municipio, Puerto Rico | $23,006 | 2.0% | 116.1% |
18 | Brown County, South Dakota | $11,057 | 0.9% | 117.0% |
19 | Faulk County, South Dakota | $5,599 | 0.5% | 117.5% |
20 | Branch County, Michigan | $4,003 | 0.3% | 117.9% |
21 | Sibley County, Minnesota | $3,598 | 0.3% | 118.2% |
22 | Gove County, Kansas | $2,786 | 0.2% | 118.4% |
23 | Wilbarger County, Texas | $2,146 | 0.2% | 118.6% |
24 | Lubbock County, Texas | $1,554 | 0.1% | 118.7% |
25 | Dawson County, Texas | $1,347 | 0.1% | 118.8% |
26 | Monroe County, Michigan | $997 | 0.1% | 118.9% |
27 | King County, Washington | $979 | 0.1% | 119.0% |
28 | Marin County, California | $583 | 0.0% | 119.1% |
29 | Hamilton County, Illinois | $583 | 0.0% | 119.1% |
30 | Hill County, Texas | $310 | 0.0% | 119.1% |
31 | Ward County, North Dakota | $274 | 0.0% | 119.2% |
32 | Barnwell County, South Carolina | $93 | 0.0% | 119.2% |
33 | Allen County, Kansas | $2 | 0.0% | 119.2% |
34 | Toole County, Montana | $-28 | 0.0% | 119.2% |
35 | McCone County, Montana | $-636 | -0.1% | 119.1% |
36 | Beadle County, South Dakota | $-3,495 | -0.3% | 118.8% |
37 | Bailey County, Texas | $-3,718 | -0.3% | 118.5% |
38 | Southampton County, Virginia | $-9,894 | -0.8% | 117.7% |
39 | Jim Wells County, Texas | $-34,428 | -2.9% | 114.7% |
40 | Atascosa County, Texas | $-55,473 | -4.7% | 110.0% |
41 | Jackson County, Indiana | $-116,621 | -10.0% | 100.0% |
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.