Emergency Conservation Program payments in Rio Blanco County, Colorado totaled $232,203 from 1995-2021.
States Receiving Emergency Conservation Program payments, 1995-2021
| Rank | State | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 | Pct of Total | Running Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Carolina | $99,895,050 | 7.4% | 7.4% |
| 2 | Florida | $97,824,939 | 7.3% | 14.7% |
| 3 | Georgia | $92,438,155 | 6.9% | 21.6% |
| 4 | Missouri | $88,309,304 | 6.6% | 28.1% |
| 5 | Texas | $78,142,519 | 5.8% | 33.9% |
| 6 | Oklahoma | $63,087,040 | 4.7% | 38.6% |
| 7 | Nebraska | $61,854,938 | 4.6% | 43.2% |
| 8 | California | $58,466,783 | 4.3% | 47.6% |
| 9 | Alabama | $55,180,467 | 4.1% | 51.7% |
| 10 | South Dakota | $54,825,559 | 4.1% | 55.7% |
| 11 | Mississippi | $53,688,789 | 4.0% | 59.7% |
| 12 | Arkansas | $51,356,509 | 3.8% | 63.5% |
| 13 | Kentucky | $49,147,638 | 3.7% | 67.2% |
| 14 | Iowa | $44,153,656 | 3.3% | 70.5% |
| 15 | Montana | $38,993,774 | 2.9% | 73.4% |
| 16 | Louisiana | $33,193,749 | 2.5% | 75.8% |
| 17 | Tennessee | $30,577,692 | 2.3% | 78.1% |
| 18 | South Carolina | $24,903,845 | 1.9% | 80.0% |
| 19 | Washington | $23,367,027 | 1.7% | 81.7% |
| 20 | Kansas | $22,060,924 | 1.6% | 83.3% |
| 21 | Oregon | $21,520,735 | 1.6% | 84.9% |
| 22 | Virginia | $19,189,854 | 1.4% | 86.4% |
| 23 | Hawaii | $17,941,705 | 1.3% | 87.7% |
| 24 | New York | $16,144,524 | 1.2% | 88.9% |
| 25 | Ohio | $13,829,831 | 1.0% | 89.9% |
| 26 | West Virginia | $13,313,469 | 1.0% | 90.9% |
| 27 | Colorado | $11,769,300 | 0.9% | 91.8% |
| 28 | Illinois | $11,341,729 | 0.8% | 92.6% |
| 29 | Wyoming | $10,685,221 | 0.8% | 93.4% |
| 30 | Idaho | $9,942,178 | 0.7% | 94.2% |
| 31 | Indiana | $7,059,928 | 0.5% | 94.7% |
| 32 | Vermont | $7,022,466 | 0.5% | 95.2% |
| 33 | New Mexico | $6,965,025 | 0.5% | 95.7% |
| 34 | Nevada | $6,566,079 | 0.5% | 96.2% |
| 35 | Utah | $6,532,361 | 0.5% | 96.7% |
| 36 | Pennsylvania | $6,393,546 | 0.5% | 97.2% |
| 37 | Massachusetts | $5,941,787 | 0.4% | 97.6% |
| 38 | Minnesota | $5,616,105 | 0.4% | 98.0% |
| 39 | Maine | $3,882,143 | 0.3% | 98.3% |
| 40 | Wisconsin | $3,698,530 | 0.3% | 98.6% |
| 41 | Arizona | $3,446,415 | 0.3% | 98.8% |
| 42 | Puerto Rico | $3,425,758 | 0.3% | 99.1% |
| 43 | North Dakota | $3,420,991 | 0.3% | 99.4% |
| 44 | Michigan | $2,324,903 | 0.2% | 99.5% |
| 45 | New Hampshire | $2,314,757 | 0.2% | 99.7% |
| 46 | New Jersey | $1,596,634 | 0.1% | 99.8% |
| 47 | Maryland | $1,579,077 | 0.1% | 99.9% |
| 48 | Connecticut | $621,564 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 49 | Rhode Island | $240,482 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 50 | Delaware | $57,974 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 51 | US Virgin Islands | $8,513 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf