Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) payments in Rush County, Indiana totaled $3,332 from 1995-2021.
States Receiving Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) payments, 1995-2021
| Rank | State | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2021 | Pct of Total | Running Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Florida | $53,906,161 | 14.3% | 14.3% |
| 2 | Texas | $48,470,131 | 12.9% | 27.2% |
| 3 | California | $40,507,388 | 10.7% | 37.9% |
| 4 | South Dakota | $24,959,349 | 6.6% | 44.5% |
| 5 | Georgia | $22,887,515 | 6.1% | 50.6% |
| 6 | North Dakota | $16,846,277 | 4.5% | 55.1% |
| 7 | Minnesota | $16,117,653 | 4.3% | 59.3% |
| 8 | Oregon | $14,338,669 | 3.8% | 63.1% |
| 9 | Idaho | $13,441,268 | 3.6% | 66.7% |
| 10 | Montana | $12,456,174 | 3.3% | 70.0% |
| 11 | Louisiana | $10,714,269 | 2.8% | 72.9% |
| 12 | Nebraska | $8,804,696 | 2.3% | 75.2% |
| 13 | Wyoming | $8,469,901 | 2.2% | 77.4% |
| 14 | Arizona | $7,890,315 | 2.1% | 79.5% |
| 15 | Washington | $7,586,451 | 2.0% | 81.6% |
| 16 | Arkansas | $6,190,529 | 1.6% | 83.2% |
| 17 | Massachusetts | $5,958,530 | 1.6% | 84.8% |
| 18 | Utah | $5,780,786 | 1.5% | 86.3% |
| 19 | Michigan | $5,723,074 | 1.5% | 87.8% |
| 20 | Iowa | $4,935,505 | 1.3% | 89.1% |
| 21 | Pennsylvania | $4,684,203 | 1.2% | 90.4% |
| 22 | Colorado | $4,024,530 | 1.1% | 91.4% |
| 23 | North Carolina | $3,792,577 | 1.0% | 92.5% |
| 24 | New York | $3,678,540 | 1.0% | 93.4% |
| 25 | Wisconsin | $3,415,958 | 0.9% | 94.3% |
| 26 | Oklahoma | $3,100,996 | 0.8% | 95.2% |
| 27 | Kansas | $2,627,459 | 0.7% | 95.9% |
| 28 | Missouri | $2,140,715 | 0.6% | 96.4% |
| 29 | Mississippi | $1,944,091 | 0.5% | 96.9% |
| 30 | New Mexico | $1,485,897 | 0.4% | 97.3% |
| 31 | Ohio | $1,378,335 | 0.4% | 97.7% |
| 32 | New Jersey | $1,132,423 | 0.3% | 98.0% |
| 33 | Virginia | $1,013,032 | 0.3% | 98.3% |
| 34 | West Virginia | $742,257 | 0.2% | 98.5% |
| 35 | Nevada | $722,694 | 0.2% | 98.7% |
| 36 | Vermont | $698,017 | 0.2% | 98.8% |
| 37 | Indiana | $666,381 | 0.2% | 99.0% |
| 38 | Illinois | $640,709 | 0.2% | 99.2% |
| 39 | Alabama | $609,891 | 0.2% | 99.3% |
| 40 | Kentucky | $494,172 | 0.1% | 99.5% |
| 41 | Maine | $362,053 | 0.1% | 99.6% |
| 42 | South Carolina | $351,832 | 0.1% | 99.7% |
| 43 | Connecticut | $298,910 | 0.1% | 99.7% |
| 44 | Hawaii | $285,216 | 0.1% | 99.8% |
| 45 | Tennessee | $243,224 | 0.1% | 99.9% |
| 46 | US Virgin Islands | $183,396 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 47 | Maryland | $97,619 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 48 | New Hampshire | $63,624 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 49 | Puerto Rico | $55,229 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 50 | Rhode Island | $9,831 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 51 | Alaska | $6,084 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf