Commodity subsidies in Des Moines County, Iowa totaled $12.2 million in 2020
States Receiving Commodity Payments, 2020
| Rank | State | Total Commodity Programs 2020 | Pct of Total | Running Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iowa | $2,836,676,338 | 8.3% | 8.3% |
| 2 | Texas | $2,285,068,255 | 6.7% | 15.1% |
| 3 | Minnesota | $2,106,190,524 | 6.2% | 21.2% |
| 4 | California | $2,067,246,159 | 6.1% | 27.3% |
| 5 | Nebraska | $2,064,280,989 | 6.1% | 33.4% |
| 6 | Illinois | $2,052,678,090 | 6.0% | 39.4% |
| 7 | Kansas | $1,840,731,740 | 5.4% | 44.8% |
| 8 | South Dakota | $1,441,760,949 | 4.2% | 49.1% |
| 9 | North Dakota | $1,402,580,086 | 4.1% | 53.2% |
| 10 | Wisconsin | $1,254,179,275 | 3.7% | 56.9% |
| 11 | Missouri | $1,153,250,969 | 3.4% | 60.3% |
| 12 | Indiana | $1,064,250,898 | 3.1% | 63.4% |
| 13 | Oklahoma | $904,762,623 | 2.7% | 66.1% |
| 14 | Ohio | $855,108,755 | 2.5% | 68.6% |
| 15 | Arkansas | $763,469,492 | 2.2% | 70.8% |
| 16 | Michigan | $705,710,363 | 2.1% | 72.9% |
| 17 | Georgia | $680,417,323 | 2.0% | 74.9% |
| 18 | Montana | $647,926,440 | 1.9% | 76.8% |
| 19 | Idaho | $616,360,201 | 1.8% | 78.6% |
| 20 | Washington | $582,750,531 | 1.7% | 80.3% |
| 21 | Mississippi | $507,285,407 | 1.5% | 81.8% |
| 22 | Colorado | $506,770,273 | 1.5% | 83.3% |
| 23 | Kentucky | $502,887,135 | 1.5% | 84.8% |
| 24 | New York | $493,490,136 | 1.5% | 86.2% |
| 25 | North Carolina | $481,075,900 | 1.4% | 87.7% |
| 26 | Florida | $432,370,222 | 1.3% | 88.9% |
| 27 | Tennessee | $423,377,494 | 1.2% | 90.2% |
| 28 | Louisiana | $416,072,370 | 1.2% | 91.4% |
| 29 | Pennsylvania | $393,652,499 | 1.2% | 92.6% |
| 30 | Oregon | $329,269,150 | 1.0% | 93.5% |
| 31 | Alabama | $310,629,748 | 0.9% | 94.4% |
| 32 | Virginia | $273,041,795 | 0.8% | 95.2% |
| 33 | New Mexico | $250,401,695 | 0.7% | 96.0% |
| 34 | Arizona | $193,076,243 | 0.6% | 96.5% |
| 35 | Wyoming | $159,384,178 | 0.5% | 97.0% |
| 36 | South Carolina | $154,486,981 | 0.5% | 97.5% |
| 37 | Utah | $147,530,053 | 0.4% | 97.9% |
| 38 | Maine | $103,653,567 | 0.3% | 98.2% |
| 39 | Maryland | $101,394,472 | 0.3% | 98.5% |
| 40 | Vermont | $80,199,213 | 0.2% | 98.7% |
| 41 | Puerto Rico | $59,215,634 | 0.2% | 98.9% |
| 42 | New Jersey | $58,843,845 | 0.2% | 99.1% |
| 43 | Nevada | $50,055,592 | 0.1% | 99.2% |
| 44 | Alaska | $49,742,741 | 0.1% | 99.4% |
| 45 | Massachusetts | $48,180,981 | 0.1% | 99.5% |
| 46 | West Virginia | $47,572,931 | 0.1% | 99.7% |
| 47 | Hawaii | $38,455,956 | 0.1% | 99.8% |
| 48 | Delaware | $30,660,673 | 0.1% | 99.9% |
| 49 | Connecticut | $26,953,634 | 0.1% | 99.9% |
| 50 | New Hampshire | $12,331,384 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 51 | Rhode Island | $7,964,685 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf