Tree Subsidies in Michigan totaled $11.8 million from 1995-2020‡.
Congressional Districts in Michigan Receiving tree subsidies, 1995-2020‡
| Rank | District | Tree Subsidies 1995-2020‡ | Pct of Total | Running Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6th District of Michigan (Rep. Fred Upton) | $5,837,756 | 49.6% | 49.6% |
| 2 | 2nd District of Michigan (Rep. Bill Huizenga) | $2,285,178 | 19.4% | 69.1% |
| 3 | 3rd District of Michigan (Rep. Justin Amash) | $1,825,309 | 15.5% | 84.6% |
| 4 | 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman) | $1,078,251 | 9.2% | 93.8% |
| 5 | 4th District of Michigan (Rep. John Moolenaar) | $325,973 | 2.8% | 96.5% |
| 6 | 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) | $135,740 | 1.2% | 97.7% |
| 7 | 8th District of Michigan (Rep. Elissa Slotkin) | $97,419 | 0.8% | 98.5% |
| 8 | 7th District of Michigan (Rep. Tim Walberg) | $52,968 | 0.5% | 99.0% |
| 9 | 5th District of Michigan (Rep. Dan Kildee) | $25,730 | 0.2% | 99.2% |
NOTE: Not all recipients were able to be placed into Congressional Districts so the District total may not total 100%. Nationally 96% of all program monies were designated into a Congressional District
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.
‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf