Commodity subsidies in Mille Lacs County, Minnesota totaled $1.7 million in 2019
States Receiving Commodity Payments, 2019
| Rank | State | Subtotal, Farming Subsidies 2019 | Pct of Total | Running Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iowa | $1,584,707,362 | 9.2% | 9.2% |
| 2 | Texas | $1,484,148,338 | 8.6% | 17.7% |
| 3 | Illinois | $1,464,440,524 | 8.5% | 26.2% |
| 4 | Kansas | $1,228,814,774 | 7.1% | 33.3% |
| 5 | Minnesota | $1,052,188,992 | 6.1% | 39.4% |
| 6 | Nebraska | $949,817,539 | 5.5% | 44.9% |
| 7 | Missouri | $881,731,118 | 5.1% | 50.0% |
| 8 | North Dakota | $872,857,447 | 5.0% | 55.0% |
| 9 | Arkansas | $827,975,733 | 4.8% | 59.8% |
| 10 | Indiana | $762,706,104 | 4.4% | 64.2% |
| 11 | Ohio | $589,983,480 | 3.4% | 67.7% |
| 12 | South Dakota | $588,183,586 | 3.4% | 71.1% |
| 13 | Georgia | $539,518,687 | 3.1% | 74.2% |
| 14 | Mississippi | $432,899,320 | 2.5% | 76.7% |
| 15 | Wisconsin | $397,299,991 | 2.3% | 79.0% |
| 16 | Michigan | $307,406,010 | 1.8% | 80.8% |
| 17 | North Carolina | $302,944,765 | 1.8% | 82.5% |
| 18 | Oklahoma | $296,206,787 | 1.7% | 84.2% |
| 19 | Louisiana | $289,685,040 | 1.7% | 85.9% |
| 20 | California | $287,113,614 | 1.7% | 87.6% |
| 21 | Tennessee | $270,430,646 | 1.6% | 89.1% |
| 22 | Kentucky | $265,098,023 | 1.5% | 90.6% |
| 23 | Montana | $226,018,678 | 1.3% | 92.0% |
| 24 | Alabama | $187,903,853 | 1.1% | 93.0% |
| 25 | Colorado | $145,963,374 | 0.8% | 93.9% |
| 26 | Pennsylvania | $121,619,271 | 0.7% | 94.6% |
| 27 | Virginia | $117,426,642 | 0.7% | 95.3% |
| 28 | Washington | $109,406,855 | 0.6% | 95.9% |
| 29 | Idaho | $108,823,919 | 0.6% | 96.5% |
| 30 | New York | $94,200,577 | 0.5% | 97.1% |
| 31 | South Carolina | $92,717,878 | 0.5% | 97.6% |
| 32 | Maryland | $84,935,443 | 0.5% | 98.1% |
| 33 | Arizona | $71,265,395 | 0.4% | 98.5% |
| 34 | New Mexico | $53,225,029 | 0.3% | 98.8% |
| 35 | Florida | $50,185,218 | 0.3% | 99.1% |
| 36 | Oregon | $46,041,765 | 0.3% | 99.4% |
| 37 | Delaware | $27,251,882 | 0.2% | 99.5% |
| 38 | Utah | $16,924,687 | 0.1% | 99.6% |
| 39 | New Jersey | $13,628,065 | 0.1% | 99.7% |
| 40 | Wyoming | $13,167,861 | 0.1% | 99.8% |
| 41 | Vermont | $11,965,290 | 0.1% | 99.9% |
| 42 | Massachusetts | $5,946,981 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 43 | West Virginia | $5,398,379 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 44 | Nevada | $4,695,291 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 45 | Maine | $4,247,505 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 46 | Connecticut | $2,025,456 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 47 | New Hampshire | $1,414,650 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 48 | Alaska | $233,411 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 49 | Hawaii | $214,012 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 50 | Rhode Island | $148,508 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.
‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf