Emergency Conservation Program payments in Greeley County, Nebraska totaled $178,530 from 1995-2023.
States Receiving Emergency Conservation Program payments, 1995-2023
| Rank | State | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 | Pct of Total | Running Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Florida | $106,891,941 | 6.9% | 6.9% |
| 2 | North Carolina | $101,361,499 | 6.6% | 13.5% |
| 3 | Georgia | $93,690,011 | 6.1% | 19.6% |
| 4 | Missouri | $89,725,319 | 5.8% | 25.4% |
| 5 | Texas | $86,740,265 | 5.6% | 31.0% |
| 6 | South Dakota | $86,358,385 | 5.6% | 36.6% |
| 7 | California | $75,195,435 | 4.9% | 41.5% |
| 8 | Nebraska | $71,310,712 | 4.6% | 46.1% |
| 9 | Oklahoma | $68,694,641 | 4.5% | 50.5% |
| 10 | Kentucky | $63,702,544 | 4.1% | 54.7% |
| 11 | Alabama | $60,137,364 | 3.9% | 58.6% |
| 12 | Montana | $57,625,833 | 3.7% | 62.3% |
| 13 | Mississippi | $54,649,543 | 3.5% | 65.8% |
| 14 | Arkansas | $54,616,151 | 3.5% | 69.4% |
| 15 | Louisiana | $47,001,230 | 3.0% | 72.4% |
| 16 | Iowa | $45,723,312 | 3.0% | 75.4% |
| 17 | Kansas | $36,278,488 | 2.4% | 77.7% |
| 18 | Tennessee | $35,364,676 | 2.3% | 80.0% |
| 19 | Oregon | $32,211,077 | 2.1% | 82.1% |
| 20 | Washington | $29,883,438 | 1.9% | 84.1% |
| 21 | South Carolina | $25,446,870 | 1.6% | 85.7% |
| 22 | Virginia | $19,451,710 | 1.3% | 87.0% |
| 23 | Hawaii | $19,011,787 | 1.2% | 88.2% |
| 24 | New York | $16,236,089 | 1.1% | 89.2% |
| 25 | West Virginia | $14,210,347 | 0.9% | 90.2% |
| 26 | Ohio | $14,206,231 | 0.9% | 91.1% |
| 27 | Wyoming | $12,938,594 | 0.8% | 91.9% |
| 28 | Colorado | $11,969,381 | 0.8% | 92.7% |
| 29 | Illinois | $11,344,567 | 0.7% | 93.4% |
| 30 | Puerto Rico | $10,198,618 | 0.7% | 94.1% |
| 31 | Idaho | $10,153,724 | 0.7% | 94.8% |
| 32 | New Mexico | $7,412,149 | 0.5% | 95.2% |
| 33 | Indiana | $7,202,517 | 0.5% | 95.7% |
| 34 | Vermont | $7,155,785 | 0.5% | 96.2% |
| 35 | Nevada | $7,008,166 | 0.5% | 96.6% |
| 36 | Minnesota | $6,742,577 | 0.4% | 97.1% |
| 37 | Massachusetts | $6,738,348 | 0.4% | 97.5% |
| 38 | Utah | $6,641,443 | 0.4% | 97.9% |
| 39 | Pennsylvania | $6,395,307 | 0.4% | 98.3% |
| 40 | North Dakota | $4,203,438 | 0.3% | 98.6% |
| 41 | Maine | $3,908,117 | 0.3% | 98.9% |
| 42 | Wisconsin | $3,717,243 | 0.2% | 99.1% |
| 43 | Arizona | $3,621,314 | 0.2% | 99.3% |
| 44 | New Hampshire | $2,524,787 | 0.2% | 99.5% |
| 45 | Michigan | $2,324,903 | 0.2% | 99.7% |
| 46 | New Jersey | $1,966,914 | 0.1% | 99.8% |
| 47 | Maryland | $1,579,077 | 0.1% | 99.9% |
| 48 | Rhode Island | $979,042 | 0.1% | 99.9% |
| 49 | Connecticut | $647,844 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 50 | Guam | $71,751 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 51 | Delaware | $57,974 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 52 | US Virgin Islands | $8,513 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 53 | Northern Mariana Islands | $7,838 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
