Conservation payments in Esmeralda County, Nevada totaled $0 in 2019
States Receiving Total Conservation Programs payments, 2019
| Rank | State | Total Conservation Programs 2019 | Pct of Total | Running Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iowa | $384,704,427 | 21.3% | 21.3% |
| 2 | Illinois | $165,894,648 | 9.2% | 30.5% |
| 3 | Minnesota | $132,918,154 | 7.4% | 37.9% |
| 4 | South Dakota | $101,139,133 | 5.6% | 43.5% |
| 5 | Texas | $100,891,298 | 5.6% | 49.1% |
| 6 | Missouri | $100,376,939 | 5.6% | 54.7% |
| 7 | Kansas | $84,583,486 | 4.7% | 59.4% |
| 8 | Washington | $71,495,782 | 4.0% | 63.4% |
| 9 | Nebraska | $70,065,026 | 3.9% | 67.2% |
| 10 | North Dakota | $67,506,337 | 3.7% | 71.0% |
| 11 | Colorado | $61,460,685 | 3.4% | 74.4% |
| 12 | Mississippi | $44,645,487 | 2.5% | 76.9% |
| 13 | Ohio | $42,124,762 | 2.3% | 79.2% |
| 14 | Indiana | $40,387,495 | 2.2% | 81.5% |
| 15 | Kentucky | $32,962,249 | 1.8% | 83.3% |
| 16 | Montana | $32,249,578 | 1.8% | 85.1% |
| 17 | Wisconsin | $30,240,565 | 1.7% | 86.7% |
| 18 | Idaho | $28,032,971 | 1.6% | 88.3% |
| 19 | Oregon | $27,817,017 | 1.5% | 89.8% |
| 20 | Louisiana | $24,906,077 | 1.4% | 91.2% |
| 21 | Oklahoma | $21,486,028 | 1.2% | 92.4% |
| 22 | Arkansas | $16,954,094 | 0.9% | 93.4% |
| 23 | Pennsylvania | $16,420,032 | 0.9% | 94.3% |
| 24 | Michigan | $15,841,525 | 0.9% | 95.2% |
| 25 | New Mexico | $13,764,169 | 0.8% | 95.9% |
| 26 | Georgia | $13,129,038 | 0.7% | 96.6% |
| 27 | Tennessee | $12,473,379 | 0.7% | 97.3% |
| 28 | Maryland | $10,592,132 | 0.6% | 97.9% |
| 29 | Alabama | $9,274,146 | 0.5% | 98.4% |
| 30 | Utah | $5,924,833 | 0.3% | 98.8% |
| 31 | Wyoming | $5,488,854 | 0.3% | 99.1% |
| 32 | North Carolina | $3,573,759 | 0.2% | 99.3% |
| 33 | California | $2,485,379 | 0.1% | 99.4% |
| 34 | Virginia | $2,393,619 | 0.1% | 99.5% |
| 35 | New York | $2,353,967 | 0.1% | 99.7% |
| 36 | South Carolina | $2,292,213 | 0.1% | 99.8% |
| 37 | Florida | $1,145,713 | 0.1% | 99.9% |
| 38 | West Virginia | $706,748 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 39 | Delaware | $512,212 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 40 | Vermont | $274,330 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 41 | Maine | $266,214 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 42 | Hawaii | $191,856 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 43 | New Jersey | $175,353 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 44 | Alaska | $145,380 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 45 | Arizona | $122,172 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 46 | Puerto Rico | $50,436 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 47 | Nevada | $22,888 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 48 | Massachusetts | $11,747 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 49 | Connecticut | $6,436 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 50 | Rhode Island | $2,701 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 51 | New Hampshire | $252 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf