Conservation payments in Douglas County, Oregon totaled $5.7 million from 1995-2021.
States Receiving Total Conservation Programs payments, 1995-2021
| Rank | State | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 | Pct of Total | Running Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iowa | $6,641,797,128 | 13.4% | 13.4% |
| 2 | Texas | $3,636,678,647 | 7.4% | 20.8% |
| 3 | Illinois | $3,279,941,710 | 6.6% | 27.4% |
| 4 | Minnesota | $3,061,783,864 | 6.2% | 33.6% |
| 5 | Kansas | $3,024,829,340 | 6.1% | 39.8% |
| 6 | Missouri | $2,883,331,554 | 5.8% | 45.6% |
| 7 | North Dakota | $2,610,845,212 | 5.3% | 50.9% |
| 8 | Montana | $2,333,307,744 | 4.7% | 55.6% |
| 9 | South Dakota | $2,091,697,501 | 4.2% | 59.8% |
| 10 | Washington | $2,025,558,703 | 4.1% | 63.9% |
| 11 | Colorado | $1,957,762,552 | 4.0% | 67.9% |
| 12 | Nebraska | $1,914,672,617 | 3.9% | 71.8% |
| 13 | Mississippi | $1,202,086,314 | 2.4% | 74.2% |
| 14 | Ohio | $1,124,534,047 | 2.3% | 76.5% |
| 15 | Indiana | $1,083,774,082 | 2.2% | 78.7% |
| 16 | Wisconsin | $1,057,822,015 | 2.1% | 80.8% |
| 17 | Kentucky | $948,216,303 | 1.9% | 82.7% |
| 18 | Idaho | $913,071,926 | 1.8% | 84.6% |
| 19 | Oklahoma | $895,525,243 | 1.8% | 86.4% |
| 20 | Oregon | $806,281,230 | 1.6% | 88.0% |
| 21 | Michigan | $565,501,502 | 1.1% | 89.2% |
| 22 | Alabama | $534,228,922 | 1.1% | 90.2% |
| 23 | Georgia | $507,018,506 | 1.0% | 91.3% |
| 24 | New Mexico | $503,882,241 | 1.0% | 92.3% |
| 25 | Louisiana | $502,774,383 | 1.0% | 93.3% |
| 26 | Pennsylvania | $478,301,498 | 1.0% | 94.3% |
| 27 | Tennessee | $438,708,344 | 0.9% | 95.2% |
| 28 | Arkansas | $430,277,385 | 0.9% | 96.0% |
| 29 | Maryland | $271,096,889 | 0.5% | 96.6% |
| 30 | Wyoming | $227,176,072 | 0.5% | 97.0% |
| 31 | North Carolina | $218,266,641 | 0.4% | 97.5% |
| 32 | Utah | $210,437,810 | 0.4% | 97.9% |
| 33 | South Carolina | $201,936,582 | 0.4% | 98.3% |
| 34 | California | $181,234,780 | 0.4% | 98.7% |
| 35 | Virginia | $174,672,494 | 0.4% | 99.0% |
| 36 | New York | $132,591,724 | 0.3% | 99.3% |
| 37 | Florida | $110,909,168 | 0.2% | 99.5% |
| 38 | Maine | $45,908,062 | 0.1% | 99.6% |
| 39 | West Virginia | $34,751,578 | 0.1% | 99.7% |
| 40 | Arizona | $29,953,158 | 0.1% | 99.7% |
| 41 | Alaska | $23,707,258 | 0.0% | 99.8% |
| 42 | Delaware | $23,166,705 | 0.0% | 99.8% |
| 43 | Vermont | $21,771,907 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 44 | Nevada | $16,429,585 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 45 | New Jersey | $12,800,937 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 46 | Hawaii | $11,170,182 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 47 | Massachusetts | $5,573,584 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 48 | Connecticut | $5,164,800 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 49 | New Hampshire | $4,490,496 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 50 | Rhode Island | $2,128,672 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 51 | Puerto Rico | $1,212,125 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 52 | US Virgin Islands | $18,883 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf