Dairy Program Subsidies in Utah totaled $57.7 million from 1995-2020‡.
States Receiving dairy program subsidies, 1995-2020‡
| Rank | State | Dairy Program Subsidies 1995-2020‡ | Pct of Total | Running Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wisconsin | $1,331,393,551 | 20.9% | 20.9% |
| 2 | California | $575,655,330 | 9.0% | 29.9% |
| 3 | New York | $573,550,752 | 9.0% | 38.9% |
| 4 | Pennsylvania | $522,266,009 | 8.2% | 47.1% |
| 5 | Minnesota | $514,210,011 | 8.1% | 55.2% |
| 6 | Michigan | $284,593,391 | 4.5% | 59.6% |
| 7 | Ohio | $232,288,084 | 3.6% | 63.3% |
| 8 | Iowa | $212,691,735 | 3.3% | 66.6% |
| 9 | Texas | $176,063,260 | 2.8% | 69.4% |
| 10 | Vermont | $140,047,514 | 2.2% | 71.6% |
| 11 | Idaho | $134,794,698 | 2.1% | 73.7% |
| 12 | Washington | $124,446,139 | 2.0% | 75.7% |
| 13 | Illinois | $115,923,654 | 1.8% | 77.5% |
| 14 | Missouri | $112,074,887 | 1.8% | 79.2% |
| 15 | Indiana | $98,607,535 | 1.5% | 80.8% |
| 16 | Virginia | $98,572,137 | 1.5% | 82.3% |
| 17 | Kentucky | $88,481,915 | 1.4% | 83.7% |
| 18 | Tennessee | $72,991,049 | 1.1% | 84.9% |
| 19 | South Dakota | $65,200,914 | 1.0% | 85.9% |
| 20 | New Mexico | $63,801,859 | 1.0% | 86.9% |
| 21 | Oregon | $63,111,896 | 1.0% | 87.9% |
| 22 | Maryland | $59,247,338 | 0.9% | 88.8% |
| 23 | Utah | $57,667,984 | 0.9% | 89.7% |
| 24 | Georgia | $55,760,898 | 0.9% | 90.6% |
| 25 | Kansas | $52,012,506 | 0.8% | 91.4% |
| 26 | North Carolina | $50,713,174 | 0.8% | 92.2% |
| 27 | Florida | $47,958,105 | 0.8% | 92.9% |
| 28 | Nebraska | $46,046,583 | 0.7% | 93.7% |
| 29 | Colorado | $39,408,567 | 0.6% | 94.3% |
| 30 | Oklahoma | $36,768,317 | 0.6% | 94.9% |
| 31 | Maine | $35,545,157 | 0.6% | 95.4% |
| 32 | Arizona | $34,269,166 | 0.5% | 96.0% |
| 33 | Louisiana | $32,697,901 | 0.5% | 96.5% |
| 34 | North Dakota | $26,431,652 | 0.4% | 96.9% |
| 35 | Mississippi | $26,043,918 | 0.4% | 97.3% |
| 36 | Connecticut | $21,330,692 | 0.3% | 97.6% |
| 37 | Massachusetts | $21,267,827 | 0.3% | 98.0% |
| 38 | Arkansas | $20,747,871 | 0.3% | 98.3% |
| 39 | Montana | $17,206,222 | 0.3% | 98.6% |
| 40 | South Carolina | $16,920,979 | 0.3% | 98.8% |
| 41 | New Hampshire | $16,618,544 | 0.3% | 99.1% |
| 42 | Alabama | $13,551,091 | 0.2% | 99.3% |
| 43 | New Jersey | $12,032,606 | 0.2% | 99.5% |
| 44 | West Virginia | $11,960,281 | 0.2% | 99.7% |
| 45 | Nevada | $8,462,002 | 0.1% | 99.8% |
| 46 | Delaware | $6,051,608 | 0.1% | 99.9% |
| 47 | Wyoming | $3,228,161 | 0.1% | 99.9% |
| 48 | Rhode Island | $1,335,217 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 49 | Hawaii | $1,331,167 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 50 | Alaska | $670,815 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.
‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf