Conservation payments in 9th District of California (Rep. Jerry McNerney) totaled $0 in 2019
States Receiving Subtotal, Conservation Programs payments, 2019
| Rank | State | Subtotal, Conservation Programs 2019 | Pct of Total | Running Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iowa | $395,806,024 | 21.0% | 21.0% |
| 2 | Illinois | $171,023,000 | 9.1% | 30.1% |
| 3 | Minnesota | $142,604,293 | 7.6% | 37.7% |
| 4 | South Dakota | $104,047,505 | 5.5% | 43.2% |
| 5 | Missouri | $102,159,467 | 5.4% | 48.6% |
| 6 | Texas | $102,082,460 | 5.4% | 54.0% |
| 7 | Kansas | $86,157,862 | 4.6% | 58.6% |
| 8 | Washington | $77,571,010 | 4.1% | 62.7% |
| 9 | Nebraska | $74,492,002 | 4.0% | 66.7% |
| 10 | North Dakota | $69,226,975 | 3.7% | 70.4% |
| 11 | Colorado | $63,893,289 | 3.4% | 73.8% |
| 12 | Ohio | $49,552,731 | 2.6% | 76.4% |
| 13 | Mississippi | $45,274,340 | 2.4% | 78.8% |
| 14 | Indiana | $44,880,205 | 2.4% | 81.2% |
| 15 | Kentucky | $35,390,013 | 1.9% | 83.1% |
| 16 | Montana | $33,489,263 | 1.8% | 84.8% |
| 17 | Wisconsin | $31,624,423 | 1.7% | 86.5% |
| 18 | Idaho | $29,908,547 | 1.6% | 88.1% |
| 19 | Oregon | $29,687,750 | 1.6% | 89.7% |
| 20 | Louisiana | $25,049,326 | 1.3% | 91.0% |
| 21 | Oklahoma | $22,068,307 | 1.2% | 92.2% |
| 22 | Michigan | $18,188,697 | 1.0% | 93.1% |
| 23 | Arkansas | $17,642,817 | 0.9% | 94.1% |
| 24 | Pennsylvania | $17,224,471 | 0.9% | 95.0% |
| 25 | Georgia | $14,440,760 | 0.8% | 95.8% |
| 26 | New Mexico | $14,010,111 | 0.7% | 96.5% |
| 27 | Tennessee | $12,903,436 | 0.7% | 97.2% |
| 28 | Maryland | $11,532,472 | 0.6% | 97.8% |
| 29 | Alabama | $9,558,675 | 0.5% | 98.3% |
| 30 | Utah | $5,959,666 | 0.3% | 98.6% |
| 31 | Wyoming | $5,525,987 | 0.3% | 98.9% |
| 32 | North Carolina | $3,822,643 | 0.2% | 99.1% |
| 33 | Virginia | $3,694,998 | 0.2% | 99.3% |
| 34 | New York | $3,271,296 | 0.2% | 99.5% |
| 35 | South Carolina | $2,566,931 | 0.1% | 99.6% |
| 36 | California | $2,485,661 | 0.1% | 99.8% |
| 37 | Florida | $1,193,833 | 0.1% | 99.8% |
| 38 | West Virginia | $986,712 | 0.1% | 99.9% |
| 39 | Delaware | $512,008 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 40 | New Jersey | $458,578 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 41 | Vermont | $371,805 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 42 | Hawaii | $337,071 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 43 | Maine | $266,214 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 44 | Alaska | $145,380 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 45 | Arizona | $122,172 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 46 | Nevada | $22,888 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 47 | Massachusetts | $11,747 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 48 | Connecticut | $6,436 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 49 | Rhode Island | $2,701 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 50 | New Hampshire | $252 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.
‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf