Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 payments in 14th District of Texas (Rep. Randy Weber) totaled $0 from 1995-2021.
States Receiving Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 payments, 1995-2021
| Rank | State | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2021 | Pct of Total | Running Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iowa | $1,606,838,137 | 8.5% | 8.5% |
| 2 | California | $1,379,329,616 | 7.3% | 15.8% |
| 3 | Illinois | $1,226,137,621 | 6.5% | 22.3% |
| 4 | Nebraska | $1,195,470,551 | 6.3% | 28.6% |
| 5 | Minnesota | $1,186,377,213 | 6.3% | 34.9% |
| 6 | Kansas | $1,064,607,473 | 5.6% | 40.5% |
| 7 | Texas | $1,012,873,815 | 5.4% | 45.9% |
| 8 | North Dakota | $842,978,605 | 4.5% | 50.3% |
| 9 | South Dakota | $807,188,820 | 4.3% | 54.6% |
| 10 | Wisconsin | $668,106,365 | 3.5% | 58.1% |
| 11 | Indiana | $643,473,524 | 3.4% | 61.5% |
| 12 | Missouri | $617,586,464 | 3.3% | 64.8% |
| 13 | Ohio | $524,393,929 | 2.8% | 67.6% |
| 14 | Michigan | $461,346,564 | 2.4% | 70.0% |
| 15 | Oklahoma | $431,370,086 | 2.3% | 72.3% |
| 16 | Montana | $421,658,675 | 2.2% | 74.5% |
| 17 | Washington | $363,076,906 | 1.9% | 76.4% |
| 18 | Idaho | $328,025,442 | 1.7% | 78.2% |
| 19 | North Carolina | $302,437,279 | 1.6% | 79.8% |
| 20 | Colorado | $300,272,133 | 1.6% | 81.4% |
| 21 | Arkansas | $293,645,358 | 1.6% | 82.9% |
| 22 | Kentucky | $290,374,733 | 1.5% | 84.4% |
| 23 | New York | $268,281,208 | 1.4% | 85.9% |
| 24 | Florida | $262,648,956 | 1.4% | 87.2% |
| 25 | Georgia | $256,421,703 | 1.4% | 88.6% |
| 26 | Oregon | $233,088,624 | 1.2% | 89.8% |
| 27 | Pennsylvania | $225,717,503 | 1.2% | 91.0% |
| 28 | Tennessee | $223,684,075 | 1.2% | 92.2% |
| 29 | Mississippi | $201,948,583 | 1.1% | 93.3% |
| 30 | Virginia | $159,840,302 | 0.8% | 94.1% |
| 31 | Louisiana | $156,547,112 | 0.8% | 95.0% |
| 32 | Alabama | $124,964,446 | 0.7% | 95.6% |
| 33 | New Mexico | $109,732,213 | 0.6% | 96.2% |
| 34 | Wyoming | $85,528,870 | 0.5% | 96.6% |
| 35 | Arizona | $81,546,127 | 0.4% | 97.1% |
| 36 | Utah | $81,404,373 | 0.4% | 97.5% |
| 37 | South Carolina | $76,688,141 | 0.4% | 97.9% |
| 38 | Maryland | $70,445,439 | 0.4% | 98.3% |
| 39 | New Jersey | $62,519,162 | 0.3% | 98.6% |
| 40 | Vermont | $34,907,150 | 0.2% | 98.8% |
| 41 | Maine | $33,680,788 | 0.2% | 99.0% |
| 42 | Massachusetts | $32,493,482 | 0.2% | 99.2% |
| 43 | West Virginia | $27,739,317 | 0.1% | 99.3% |
| 44 | Nevada | $27,166,251 | 0.1% | 99.4% |
| 45 | Delaware | $24,945,420 | 0.1% | 99.6% |
| 46 | Hawaii | $22,709,296 | 0.1% | 99.7% |
| 47 | Puerto Rico | $22,647,961 | 0.1% | 99.8% |
| 48 | Connecticut | $22,175,106 | 0.1% | 99.9% |
| 49 | New Hampshire | $7,195,397 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 50 | Rhode Island | $4,845,523 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 51 | Alaska | $1,215,160 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf