Environmental Quality Incentives Program payments in 19th District of Texas (Rep. Jodey Arrington) totaled $6.8 million from 1995-2023.
States Receiving Environmental Quality Incentives Program payments, 1995-2023
| Rank | State | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 | Pct of Total | Running Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Texas | $80,298,602 | 8.5% | 8.5% |
| 2 | Colorado | $42,886,371 | 4.5% | 13.0% |
| 3 | California | $42,508,136 | 4.5% | 17.6% |
| 4 | Montana | $33,290,656 | 3.5% | 21.1% |
| 5 | Nebraska | $31,918,774 | 3.4% | 24.5% |
| 6 | Utah | $28,608,421 | 3.0% | 27.5% |
| 7 | Kansas | $28,606,754 | 3.0% | 30.5% |
| 8 | Mississippi | $28,130,687 | 3.0% | 33.5% |
| 9 | Iowa | $25,932,844 | 2.7% | 36.2% |
| 10 | New Mexico | $25,426,666 | 2.7% | 38.9% |
| 11 | Minnesota | $25,021,716 | 2.7% | 41.6% |
| 12 | Wyoming | $24,410,716 | 2.6% | 44.2% |
| 13 | North Carolina | $24,038,088 | 2.5% | 46.7% |
| 14 | Arkansas | $23,594,726 | 2.5% | 49.2% |
| 15 | Arizona | $22,932,475 | 2.4% | 51.7% |
| 16 | Missouri | $22,924,901 | 2.4% | 54.1% |
| 17 | Oklahoma | $22,404,517 | 2.4% | 56.5% |
| 18 | Washington | $21,365,627 | 2.3% | 58.7% |
| 19 | Louisiana | $21,282,621 | 2.3% | 61.0% |
| 20 | Georgia | $20,688,172 | 2.2% | 63.2% |
| 21 | South Dakota | $20,687,700 | 2.2% | 65.4% |
| 22 | Florida | $20,536,603 | 2.2% | 67.5% |
| 23 | Oregon | $20,283,453 | 2.1% | 69.7% |
| 24 | North Dakota | $19,800,367 | 2.1% | 71.8% |
| 25 | Idaho | $19,735,329 | 2.1% | 73.9% |
| 26 | Wisconsin | $19,645,945 | 2.1% | 75.9% |
| 27 | Illinois | $18,819,338 | 2.0% | 77.9% |
| 28 | Alabama | $18,758,005 | 2.0% | 79.9% |
| 29 | Michigan | $17,653,313 | 1.9% | 81.8% |
| 30 | Ohio | $14,407,309 | 1.5% | 83.3% |
| 31 | Tennessee | $14,244,907 | 1.5% | 84.8% |
| 32 | Kentucky | $14,183,326 | 1.5% | 86.3% |
| 33 | Pennsylvania | $13,942,814 | 1.5% | 87.8% |
| 34 | New York | $13,696,864 | 1.5% | 89.3% |
| 35 | Indiana | $13,643,147 | 1.4% | 90.7% |
| 36 | Virginia | $13,418,976 | 1.4% | 92.1% |
| 37 | Maine | $13,168,301 | 1.4% | 93.5% |
| 38 | South Carolina | $12,200,210 | 1.3% | 94.8% |
| 39 | West Virginia | $8,261,581 | 0.9% | 95.7% |
| 40 | Maryland | $8,198,547 | 0.9% | 96.6% |
| 41 | Nevada | $5,917,591 | 0.6% | 97.2% |
| 42 | Delaware | $5,687,478 | 0.6% | 97.8% |
| 43 | Vermont | $5,355,814 | 0.6% | 98.4% |
| 44 | Connecticut | $2,898,684 | 0.3% | 98.7% |
| 45 | New Hampshire | $2,825,496 | 0.3% | 99.0% |
| 46 | New Jersey | $2,689,925 | 0.3% | 99.3% |
| 47 | Massachusetts | $2,576,926 | 0.3% | 99.5% |
| 48 | Hawaii | $2,074,477 | 0.2% | 99.7% |
| 49 | Rhode Island | $1,213,041 | 0.1% | 99.9% |
| 50 | Alaska | $1,208,855 | 0.1% | 100.0% |
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
