Dairy Programs payments in 2nd District of Wisconsin (Rep. Mark Pocan) totaled $376,413 in 2010
States Receiving Dairy Programs payments, 2010
| Rank | State | Dairy Programs 2010 | Pct of Total | Running Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wisconsin | $14,125,025 | 18.2% | 18.2% |
| 2 | California | $10,754,714 | 13.9% | 32.1% |
| 3 | New York | $5,579,471 | 7.2% | 39.3% |
| 4 | Minnesota | $5,371,472 | 6.9% | 46.2% |
| 5 | Pennsylvania | $5,236,639 | 6.8% | 53.0% |
| 6 | Puerto Rico | $3,583,421 | 4.6% | 57.6% |
| 7 | Michigan | $3,510,128 | 4.5% | 62.1% |
| 8 | Ohio | $2,759,047 | 3.6% | 65.7% |
| 9 | Iowa | $2,290,308 | 3.0% | 68.6% |
| 10 | Texas | $2,276,312 | 2.9% | 71.6% |
| 11 | Idaho | $1,595,927 | 2.1% | 73.6% |
| 12 | Vermont | $1,587,557 | 2.0% | 75.7% |
| 13 | Washington | $1,509,559 | 1.9% | 77.6% |
| 14 | Indiana | $1,310,537 | 1.7% | 79.3% |
| 15 | Illinois | $1,181,212 | 1.5% | 80.8% |
| 16 | Virginia | $1,017,745 | 1.3% | 82.2% |
| 17 | Missouri | $981,247 | 1.3% | 83.4% |
| 18 | Colorado | $940,500 | 1.2% | 84.6% |
| 19 | Georgia | $830,180 | 1.1% | 85.7% |
| 20 | Florida | $802,335 | 1.0% | 86.7% |
| 21 | New Mexico | $776,661 | 1.0% | 87.7% |
| 22 | Oregon | $771,820 | 1.0% | 88.7% |
| 23 | Kentucky | $759,721 | 1.0% | 89.7% |
| 24 | South Dakota | $721,271 | 0.9% | 90.7% |
| 25 | Utah | $675,889 | 0.9% | 91.5% |
| 26 | Kansas | $597,830 | 0.8% | 92.3% |
| 27 | Nebraska | $592,378 | 0.8% | 93.1% |
| 28 | Tennessee | $586,651 | 0.8% | 93.8% |
| 29 | Maryland | $579,398 | 0.7% | 94.6% |
| 30 | Arizona | $578,610 | 0.7% | 95.3% |
| 31 | North Carolina | $493,099 | 0.6% | 96.0% |
| 32 | Maine | $358,275 | 0.5% | 96.4% |
| 33 | Oklahoma | $346,863 | 0.4% | 96.9% |
| 34 | Montana | $323,071 | 0.4% | 97.3% |
| 35 | North Dakota | $252,358 | 0.3% | 97.6% |
| 36 | Connecticut | $238,076 | 0.3% | 97.9% |
| 37 | South Carolina | $216,558 | 0.3% | 98.2% |
| 38 | Massachusetts | $194,400 | 0.3% | 98.4% |
| 39 | Louisiana | $183,435 | 0.2% | 98.7% |
| 40 | New Hampshire | $180,518 | 0.2% | 98.9% |
| 41 | Mississippi | $139,291 | 0.2% | 99.1% |
| 42 | Alabama | $137,022 | 0.2% | 99.3% |
| 43 | Arkansas | $119,842 | 0.2% | 99.4% |
| 44 | Nevada | $108,690 | 0.1% | 99.6% |
| 45 | New Jersey | $98,456 | 0.1% | 99.7% |
| 46 | West Virginia | $93,632 | 0.1% | 99.8% |
| 47 | Delaware | $59,118 | 0.1% | 99.9% |
| 48 | Hawaii | $47,068 | 0.1% | 99.9% |
| 49 | Wyoming | $23,738 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 50 | Rhode Island | $11,891 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 51 | Alaska | $6,867 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf