Emergency Conservation Program in the United States, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 190,562
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in the United States totaled $1,346,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Evans Farms Gp | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $1,655,002 |
2 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $1,437,045 |
3 | Howard Farms | Deep Run, NC 28525 | $1,173,060 |
4 | Griffin Farms | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $1,059,390 |
5 | Mason Pecans | Kathleen, GA 31047 | $1,007,065 |
6 | Stella Farms | Stockton, CA 95206 | $948,810 |
7 | P G C Farms | Brinson, GA 39825 | $880,320 |
8 | Worsham Farms Partnership | Camilla, GA 31730 | $874,698 |
9 | Gamble Family Farms | New Zion, SC 29111 | $870,814 |
10 | Luther Griffin Farm | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $859,390 |
11 | Anthony C Smith Farms Partnership | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $839,060 |
12 | James E Jr And Wanda H Howard | Deep Run, NC 28525 | $803,306 |
13 | Heard Family Farm | Brinson, GA 39825 | $732,618 |
14 | Gipson Brothers | Bigelow, AR 72016 | $696,547 |
15 | Neale Farms Incorporated | Fort Calhoun, NE 68023 | $602,030 |
16 | B Murdoch Farms LLC | Union, NE 68455 | $581,875 |
17 | Jerry P Johnson | Troy, KS 66087 | $528,243 |
18 | Estill Ranches LLC | Gerlach, NV 89412 | $512,500 |
19 | Beverly Bailey Family Trust | Hollywood, MD 20636 | $500,000 |
20 | Harry & Lynda Properties LLC | Nebraska City, NE 68410 | $500,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>