Direct Payment Program in the United States, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,791,896
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in the United States totaled $53,844,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | New Hope Farms | Schlater, MS 38952 | $4,168,699 |
22 | Live Oaks Planting Company | Schlater, MS 38952 | $4,072,843 |
23 | Seward & Son Planting Company | Louise, MS 39097 | $3,964,540 |
24 | Perthshire Farms | Gunnison, MS 38746 | $3,960,508 |
25 | R A Pickens And Son Company | Pickens, AR 71662 | $3,945,294 |
26 | Hlavinka Cattle Co Jv | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $3,899,065 |
27 | H Four Farms III | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $3,872,311 |
28 | Buttonwillow Land And Cattle Co | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $3,870,749 |
29 | Crossroad Farms | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $3,862,348 |
30 | Hard Bargain Farms Partnership | Epps, LA 71237 | $3,861,875 |
31 | Deshotels Farm Management | Lettsworth, LA 70753 | $3,859,589 |
32 | P R P Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $3,797,798 |
33 | Schenley Farm Ptrshp | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $3,707,100 |
34 | Phillips Farms | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $3,665,851 |
35 | Holly Ridge Planting Co | Indianola, MS 38751 | $3,654,544 |
36 | Soudan Farming Co | Marianna, AR 72360 | $3,641,666 |
37 | R Gorrill Ranch Enterprises | Durham, CA 95938 | $3,621,439 |
38 | Pitts Farms | Indianola, MS 38751 | $3,579,547 |
39 | Maxwell Farms | Benoit, MS 38725 | $3,512,350 |
40 | Brantley Farming Co | England, AR 72046 | $3,509,770 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”