Loan Deficiency in the United States, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,296,626
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in the United States totaled $31,301,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Chs Inc | Kindred, ND 58051 | $39,376,270 |
2 | Riceland Foods Inc | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $19,368,132 |
3 | Farmers Rice Coop | Sacramento, CA 95851 | $16,960,855 |
4 | Tyler Farms | Helena, AR 72342 | $12,619,304 |
5 | Producers Rice Mill Inc | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $8,004,798 |
6 | Ritchey Bayou Farms | Greenville, MS 38703 | $4,775,526 |
7 | Maxwell Farms | Benoit, MS 38725 | $4,388,834 |
8 | Walker Place | Danville, IL 61832 | $3,962,393 |
9 | Tohono O'odham Farming Authority | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $3,916,163 |
10 | Dixie Farms | Vance, MS 38964 | $3,802,014 |
11 | T & T Farms | Leesburg, GA 31763 | $3,635,021 |
12 | Bruton Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $3,618,618 |
13 | Wabash Farms | Helena, AR 72342 | $3,304,443 |
14 | Angelina Plantation | Monterey, LA 71354 | $3,073,237 |
15 | Coghlan Farms | Benoit, MS 38725 | $3,064,875 |
16 | John M Mobley & Sons | Moultrie, GA 31776 | $3,052,402 |
17 | Stovall Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $3,017,341 |
18 | Producers Marketing Cooperative | Mertzon, TX 76941 | $2,956,417 |
19 | Missouri Delta Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $2,922,837 |
20 | Farmers Cooperative Of El Campo | El Campo, TX 77437 | $2,915,179 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>