Market Gains in the United States, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 240,701

Recipients of Market Gains from farms in the United States totaled $5,351,000,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Market Gains
1995-2021
1Farmers Rice CoopSacramento, CA 95851$56,813,419
2Producers Rice Mill IncStuttgart, AR 72160$51,982,835
3Riceland Foods IncStuttgart, AR 72160$47,009,109
4Concordia Allied Producers LLCAshburn, GA 31714$18,909,885
5American Peanut Marketing Assoc.Leary, GA 39862$14,843,397
6Chs IncKindred, ND 58051$6,416,540
7Missouri Delta FarmsSikeston, MO 63801$5,159,953
8S J R FarmingLos Banos, CA 93635$4,383,409
9Peanut Marketing Loan Services LlStephenville, TX 76401$3,650,830
10Gfa Peanut AssociationCamilla, GA 31730$3,281,583
11Tyler FarmsHelena, AR 72342$2,708,536
12V-c Peanut Dma LLCFranklin, VA 23851$2,569,488
13Bowles Farming Company IncLos Banos, CA 93635$2,482,360
14Red River FarmsBlythe, CA 92225$2,438,773
15H E Jordan & Family Farm PartnershpGates, TN 38037$2,378,919
16Mitchener Pltg CoSumner, MS 38957$2,357,428
17Adams Land CoLeachville, AR 72438$2,151,075
18Peanut Loan Processing CenterGorman, TX 76454$2,146,231
19M & M Farm PartnershipHickory Ridge, AR 72347$2,136,029
20Coleman Farms PtrJonesboro, AR 72404$2,034,653

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag