CCC Organic Programs in the United States, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 5,887
Recipients of CCC Organic Programs from farms in the United States totaled $9,064,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | CCC Organic Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Natural Grocers By Vitamin Cottag | Lakewood, CO 80228 | $183,500 |
2 | Vitamin Cottage Natural Foods Markets , Inc | Lakewood, CO 80228 | $167,359 |
3 | Crystal Valley Farms LLC D/b/a Miller Poultry | Orland, IN 46776 | $147,797 |
4 | Natural Family Farms, LLC | Middlebury, IN 46540 | $97,849 |
5 | Dutch Country Organics LLC | Shipshewana, IN 46565 | $83,271 |
6 | Shenandoah Growers Inc. | Harrisonburg, VA 22802 | $37,891 |
7 | Shenandoah Valley Organic, LLC | Harrisonburg, VA 22802 | $30,803 |
8 | Egg Innovations LLC | Warsaw, IN 46581 | $28,503 |
9 | Egg Innovations LLC | Warsaw, IN 46580 | $28,427 |
10 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $9,776 |
11 | Brian F Koenigsknecht | Fowler, MI 48835 | $9,115 |
12 | Hilhof Farm Dairy | Hersey, MI 49639 | $8,250 |
13 | Brookshire Brothers | Lufkin, TX 75902 | $7,532 |
14 | Radiance Dairy LLC | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $7,498 |
15 | Gary T Bond | Franklinton, LA 70438 | $7,458 |
16 | Edelweiss Dairy Inc | Everson, WA 98247 | $7,247 |
17 | Thomas P Schwarz | Bertrand, NE 68927 | $7,000 |
18 | Kendall Temples | Angie, LA 70426 | $6,599 |
19 | Matthew T Green | Fort Mitchell, AL 36856 | $6,550 |
20 | Arrowhead Co | Colusa, CA 95932 | $6,522 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>