Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program in the United States, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 7,544
Recipients of Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program from farms in the United States totaled $65,342,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Emerald Grove LLC | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $160,000 |
| 22 | Banack Family Limited Partnership | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $158,800 |
| 23 | Caulkins Citrus Company Ltd | Indiantown, FL 34956 | $149,520 |
| 24 | Wheeler Farms Inc | Lake Placid, FL 33862 | $149,034 |
| 25 | Heritage Land Co LLC | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $145,320 |
| 26 | Smith Ranch & Grove Lc | Fort Pierce, FL 34951 | $144,875 |
| 27 | Northwood LLC | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $144,000 |
| 28 | Lambeth Citrus Ltd | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $138,824 |
| 29 | Wesley Hansen | Labelle, FL 33975 | $138,067 |
| 30 | B M B Groves Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32962 | $135,950 |
| 31 | Estes Groves Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $133,651 |
| 32 | Sunshine Agriculture Incorporated | Memphis, TN 38138 | $133,264 |
| 33 | Campbell Groves LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $130,741 |
| 34 | Pride Enterprises | Belle Glade, FL 33430 | $128,411 |
| 35 | Evans Properties Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32963 | $127,040 |
| 36 | Acosta Farms Inc | Miami, FL 33197 | $126,620 |
| 37 | E H G Ranch Partnership | Lake Wales, FL 33859 | $125,926 |
| 38 | Cracker Trail Groves Llp | Fort Pierce, FL 34946 | $124,897 |
| 39 | Hilliard Brothers Of Florida Limi | Clewiston, FL 33440 | $124,540 |
| 40 | Scott Groves Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $123,760 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf