Farm Subsidy information
Alabama
Total Subsidies in Alabama, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 88,322
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Alabama totaled $4,952,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ameris Bank ** | Dothan, AL 36303 | $6,287,918 |
22 | Tate Farms | Meridianville, AL 35759 | $6,251,084 |
23 | Liikatchka Plantation General Partnership | Eufaula, AL 36027 | $6,178,530 |
24 | D & C Thornton Farms | Rogersville, AL 35652 | $6,109,882 |
25 | Thornton Farms | Rogersville, AL 35652 | $5,979,917 |
26 | Cannon Farms | Theodore, AL 36590 | $5,841,786 |
27 | Henderson Farms | Madison, AL 35756 | $5,759,192 |
28 | Sirmon Farms | Daphne, AL 36526 | $5,733,364 |
29 | Counts Farms | Muscle Shoals, AL 35661 | $5,690,008 |
30 | Herman Rochester & Sons | Leesburg, AL 35983 | $5,511,907 |
31 | Moravec Farms | Saint Elmo, AL 36568 | $5,417,347 |
32 | P & J Farms | Mount Hope, AL 35651 | $5,251,019 |
33 | Sublett Farms | Ardmore, AL 35739 | $5,168,867 |
34 | Wisener Farms | Tallassee, AL 36078 | $5,102,565 |
35 | Pitchford Farms | Columbia, AL 36319 | $5,086,792 |
36 | Mullek Farms | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $5,013,325 |
37 | Ward Farms | Atmore, AL 36502 | $4,982,687 |
38 | Bragg Farming Company | Toney, AL 35773 | $4,931,380 |
39 | Gibbs Farms | Atmore, AL 36504 | $4,908,428 |
40 | Lamon Farm | Trinity, AL 35673 | $4,891,381 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”