Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Alabama, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,929
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Alabama totaled $1,349,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Carl Lucas | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $9,736 |
22 | D & C Thornton Farms | Rogersville, AL 35652 | $9,256 |
23 | Wendland Farms General Partnership | Autaugaville, AL 36003 | $9,127 |
24 | Liikatchka Plantation General Partnership | Eufaula, AL 36027 | $8,957 |
25 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $8,819 |
26 | Walters Farming Company | Gallion, AL 36742 | $8,600 |
27 | Martin Farm | Courtland, AL 35618 | $8,505 |
28 | Skinner Farms LLC | Hartford, AL 36344 | $8,357 |
29 | Isbell Farms | Muscle Shoals, AL 35662 | $8,312 |
30 | John M Neal | Scottsboro, AL 35769 | $8,310 |
31 | Tate Farms General Partnership | Meridianville, AL 35759 | $8,302 |
32 | Richard Jaggers | Sulligent, AL 35586 | $8,067 |
33 | Jonathan Skinner | Bonifay, FL 32425 | $7,982 |
34 | Wilson Mann III | Owens Cross Roads, AL 35763 | $7,766 |
35 | Lamon Farm | Trinity, AL 35673 | $7,748 |
36 | Spruell Farms | Mount Hope, AL 35651 | $7,704 |
37 | Jimmy White | Rogersville, AL 35652 | $7,545 |
38 | R & R Farms | Danville, AL 35619 | $7,541 |
39 | First Southern Bank | Florence, AL 35631 | $7,424 |
40 | Jv & P Farms | Newton, AL 36352 | $7,400 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”