Farm Subsidy information
Baldwin County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Baldwin County, Alabama, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 218
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Baldwin County, Alabama totaled $10,854,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Petelinski Brothers | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $624,260 |
2 | Mullek Farms | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $565,167 |
3 | Sirmon Farms | Daphne, AL 36526 | $549,184 |
4 | Dorland Farms | Orange Beach, AL 36561 | $331,662 |
5 | Bartl Farms | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $305,971 |
6 | Salac Family Limited Partnership | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $265,146 |
7 | First South Farm Credit Aca ** | Winnsboro, LA 71295 | $253,817 |
8 | Hilbert Eric Hall | Bay Minette, AL 36507 | $239,495 |
9 | Fairhope Dairy | Point Clear, AL 36564 | $209,954 |
10 | Nutrien Ag Solutions | Spanish Fort, AL 36527 | $201,292 |
11 | Daniel O'brien | Mobile, AL 36633 | $199,760 |
12 | Cassebaum Farms Inc | Lillian, AL 36549 | $198,594 |
13 | Penry Farms Inc | Daphne, AL 36526 | $178,955 |
14 | Dvn Underwood Farms Inc | Foley, AL 36535 | $175,285 |
15 | Lehmann Farms | Summerdale, AL 36580 | $172,375 |
16 | Kaiser Farms Inc | Elberta, AL 36530 | $151,041 |
17 | A A Bertolla Farms LLC | Daphne, AL 36526 | $150,384 |
18 | Fairhope Cotton Co | Fairhope, AL 36532 | $146,424 |
19 | James Lipscomb & Sons | Foley, AL 36535 | $135,932 |
20 | Doug Lowell Jr | Fairhope, AL 36532 | $128,822 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>