Farm Subsidy information
Dale County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Dale County, Alabama, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 314
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dale County, Alabama totaled $7,712,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shipes Farms | Headland, AL 36345 | $626,254 |
| 2 | Chris Thompson Farms Gp | Midland City, AL 36350 | $538,586 |
| 3 | Ameris Bank ** | Dothan, AL 36303 | $442,915 |
| 4 | Friend Bank ** | Slocomb, AL 36375 | $338,136 |
| 5 | Beasley Farms | Newton, AL 36352 | $228,632 |
| 6 | Thomas Kirkland Farm | Headland, AL 36345 | $201,121 |
| 7 | Mark Donnell Farms | Daleville, AL 36322 | $184,046 |
| 8 | David E Byrd | Midland City, AL 36350 | $159,187 |
| 9 | Clay Ellenburg Farms | Newton, AL 36352 | $155,334 |
| 10 | Nowell Farms | Headland, AL 36345 | $148,977 |
| 11 | Pouncey Farms LLC | Daleville, AL 36322 | $134,445 |
| 12 | Lightard Stump Farm | Daleville, AL 36322 | $132,793 |
| 13 | Williams Farm LLC | Newton, AL 36352 | $130,606 |
| 14 | Auston Lane Walden | Daleville, AL 36322 | $123,319 |
| 15 | Lee T Peters | Ozark, AL 36360 | $120,877 |
| 16 | William L Bullock Estate | Midland City, AL 36350 | $118,707 |
| 17 | William L Bullock Jr | Midland City, AL 36350 | $118,707 |
| 18 | Byrd Farms LLC | Ariton, AL 36311 | $108,129 |
| 19 | Anna M Fink | Enterprise, AL 36330 | $101,922 |
| 20 | Larry Paul Morrison | Ariton, AL 36311 | $100,655 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf