Farm Subsidy information
Henry County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Henry County, Alabama, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 416
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Henry County, Alabama totaled $14,348,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Pitchford Farms | Columbia, AL 36319 | $668,718 |
2 | Ameris Bank ** | Dothan, AL 36303 | $457,953 |
3 | James C And Mary J Parker Farms | Headland, AL 36345 | $442,394 |
4 | Bristow Farms Partnership | Columbia, AL 36319 | $385,900 |
5 | Circle W Farms | Columbia, AL 36319 | $381,788 |
6 | Djl Company | Headland, AL 36345 | $365,370 |
7 | Adams Farms Partnership | Newville, AL 36353 | $340,055 |
8 | Shipes Farms | Headland, AL 36345 | $330,363 |
9 | Marty Marshall Farms Partnership | Headland, AL 36345 | $244,414 |
10 | Woodham Cattle Company LLC | Headland, AL 36345 | $233,982 |
11 | Charles Phillip Hayes | Abbeville, AL 36310 | $228,014 |
12 | Turkey Creek Farms Inc | Newville, AL 36353 | $222,943 |
13 | Danny Ellison | Headland, AL 36345 | $219,407 |
14 | K & E Farms Inc | Headland, AL 36345 | $213,632 |
15 | Mims Farms/tm | Abbeville, AL 36310 | $209,164 |
16 | D And M Farms | Headland, AL 36345 | $198,538 |
17 | Phillips Farms | Shorterville, AL 36373 | $198,271 |
18 | Dirty Pond Farms Inc | Newville, AL 36353 | $197,837 |
19 | Andrew H Armstrong | Headland, AL 36345 | $182,060 |
20 | Scott Shelley Farms Inc. | Columbia, AL 36319 | $160,310 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>