Farm Subsidy information
Mobile County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Mobile County, Alabama, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,076
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mobile County, Alabama totaled $94,011,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Driskell Cotton Farms | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $12,187,192 |
| 2 | Cannon Farms | Theodore, AL 36590 | $5,841,786 |
| 3 | Moravec Farms | Saint Elmo, AL 36568 | $5,324,287 |
| 4 | Sessions Farm | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $3,915,018 |
| 5 | Big Creek Farms | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $3,214,635 |
| 6 | Dorland Farms | Mobile, AL 36695 | $3,194,303 |
| 7 | Moravec St Elmo Farms | St Elmo, AL 36568 | $2,639,651 |
| 8 | Seward Farms | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $1,960,772 |
| 9 | 4 M Family Farms | Saint Elmo, AL 36568 | $1,610,491 |
| 10 | Warden Farms | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $1,511,204 |
| 11 | Dorland Farms | Orange Beach, AL 36561 | $1,393,908 |
| 12 | Thornburg Farms | Wilmer, AL 36587 | $1,375,518 |
| 13 | Thornburg Farms | Wilmer, AL 36587 | $1,065,417 |
| 14 | Clark Farms | Saint Elmo, AL 36568 | $984,952 |
| 15 | Roberts Farm | Mobile, AL 36608 | $958,203 |
| 16 | Felps Farm | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $726,019 |
| 17 | William Kevin Driskell | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $715,822 |
| 18 | Driskell Brothers Farms | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $710,232 |
| 19 | Middleton Farms | Mobile, AL 36608 | $625,035 |
| 20 | Martin's Nursery Inc | Semmes, AL 36575 | $571,908 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf