Farm Subsidy information
Monroe County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Monroe County, Alabama, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,305
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Monroe County, Alabama totaled $126,056,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Farrar & Byrd Farm | Uriah, AL 36480 | $1,245,322 |
22 | Micky Wilkins | Atmore, AL 36502 | $1,238,135 |
23 | Jason H Chunn | Atmore, AL 36502 | $1,096,116 |
24 | James C Moore Jr | Frisco City, AL 36445 | $1,071,744 |
25 | Justin W Gaines | Vredenburgh, AL 36481 | $1,024,489 |
26 | Scott E Saucer | Frisco City, AL 36445 | $1,012,204 |
27 | Mark Lancaster | Frisco City, AL 36445 | $1,010,782 |
28 | Nancy C Simpson | Frisco City, AL 36445 | $960,177 |
29 | Jeffery D Bailey | Frisco City, AL 36445 | $943,241 |
30 | Ward Farms | Atmore, AL 36502 | $929,835 |
31 | H L Lancaster | Frisco City, AL 36445 | $896,291 |
32 | Sherry L Bailey | Uriah, AL 36480 | $865,301 |
33 | Danny P Simpson | Frisco City, AL 36445 | $841,644 |
34 | James C Griffin | Uriah, AL 36480 | $833,985 |
35 | Larry Wayne House | Uriah, AL 36480 | $818,644 |
36 | Wesley R Saucer | Uriah, AL 36480 | $802,002 |
37 | United Bank Of Atmore ** | Atmore, AL 36504 | $796,020 |
38 | Sue D Gaines | Hybart, AL 36481 | $783,276 |
39 | Maureen House | Uriah, AL 36480 | $769,024 |
40 | Stacey Kelly | Monroeville, AL 36460 | $750,691 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”