Total Commodity Programs in Russell County, Alabama, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 101
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Russell County, Alabama totaled $1,924,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Westover Planting Co | Eufaula, AL 36027 | $796,624 |
| 2 | Jeremie Redden | Seale, AL 36875 | $151,295 |
| 3 | Liikatchka Plantation General Partnership | Eufaula, AL 36027 | $124,998 |
| 4 | 22nd State Bank ** | Eufaula, AL 36072 | $75,979 |
| 5 | Gene Wesley Cox | Phenix City, AL 36870 | $68,952 |
| 6 | Baker Farms | Opelika, AL 36804 | $55,184 |
| 7 | B & T Farms Llp | Phenix City, AL 36869 | $54,720 |
| 8 | Michael Knight | Seale, AL 36875 | $50,556 |
| 9 | Mary L Mathews | Hurtsboro, AL 36860 | $47,011 |
| 10 | Jls Farms LLC | Eufaula, AL 36027 | $38,872 |
| 11 | Matthew T Green | Fort Mitchell, AL 36856 | $38,832 |
| 12 | Wylaunee Farms General Partnership | Eufaula, AL 36027 | $33,114 |
| 13 | Jeanette I Torbert | Opelika, AL 36804 | $24,537 |
| 14 | Rick Bingham | Phenix City, AL 36869 | $23,001 |
| 15 | Harris Sistrunk | Hatchechubbee, AL 36858 | $18,526 |
| 16 | Danny R Lindsey | Smiths, AL 36877 | $17,962 |
| 17 | Matthew Pamperin | Opelika, AL 36804 | $15,834 |
| 18 | Adam D Wilson | Phenix City, AL 36869 | $12,716 |
| 19 | Lazenby Farms LLC | Auburn, AL 36830 | $11,431 |
| 20 | J L Smith Farms | Phenix City, AL 36869 | $10,461 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf