Farm Subsidy information
Alaska
Total Subsidies in Alaska, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 194
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Alaska totaled $892,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dennis Green & Sons Partnership | Delta Junction, AK 99737 | $85,021 |
| 2 | Dart Am LLC | North Pole, AK 99705 | $64,316 |
| 3 | Schultz Farms Inc | Delta Junction, AK 99737 | $61,602 |
| 4 | Scott W Schultz | Delta Junction, AK 99737 | $30,863 |
| 5 | John M Robinson | Delta Junction, AK 99737 | $23,587 |
| 6 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $22,651 |
| 7 | Insanity Acres | Delta Junction, AK 99737 | $22,426 |
| 8 | Arctic Rose Farm | Delta Junction, AK 99737 | $22,308 |
| 9 | Bob A Havemeister | Palmer, AK 99645 | $17,220 |
| 10 | Wrigley Farms LLC | Delta Junction, AK 99737 | $17,087 |
| 11 | Pamela M Rule | Delta Junction, AK 99737 | $16,688 |
| 12 | Scott Alan Mugrage | Delta Junction, AK 99737 | $12,995 |
| 13 | The Richard D Karr 2014 Trust | Delta Junction, AK 99737 | $12,976 |
| 14 | Circle S Ranch, LLC | Delta Junction, AK 99737 | $10,216 |
| 15 | Krenitzin Island Cattle Co | Akutan, AK 99553 | $9,269 |
| 16 | Jay Tope | Delta Junction, AK 99737 | $8,988 |
| 17 | Stephen M Sims | Anchorage, AK 99507 | $8,445 |
| 18 | Wilma Tope | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $7,793 |
| 19 | Michael A Schultz | Delta Junction, AK 99737 | $7,262 |
| 20 | Flyway Farm L L C | Anchorage, AK 99517 | $7,190 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf