Farm Subsidy information

Alaska

Total Subsidies in Alaska, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 6,006

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Alaska totaled $151,839,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2021
1Dennis Green & Sons PartnershipDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,841,586
2Schultz Farms IncDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,775,067
3Arctic Rose FarmDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,420,611
4Sawmill Creek RanchDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,157,956
5Pamela M RuleDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,120,444
6John M RobinsonDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,113,871
7Eagles' Ridge Community Church IncDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,035,564
8Ronald J RobinsonDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,029,766
9Dennis D. And Cleo V. Green RevocDelta Junction, AK 99737$877,042
10Marlene J RobinsonDelta Junction, AK 99737$824,472
11Scott W SchultzDelta Junction, AK 99737$785,409
12Stevens Village Ira CouncilStevens Village, AK 99774$654,248
13Michael A SchultzDelta Junction, AK 99737$650,410
14Transalaska PropertiesFairbanks, AK 99707$632,165
15Theuringer FarmDelta Junction, AK 99737$622,296
16Brenda PetersonDelta Junction, AK 99737$546,642
17Insanity AcresDelta Junction, AK 99737$529,046
18Kent E SteeleDelta Junction, AK 99737$489,336
19R & B Wrigley PtnDelta Junction, AK 99737$438,971
20Coplee International IncKodiak, AK 99615$424,919

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag