Total Conservation Programs in Alaska, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 283

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Alaska totaled $23,707,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2021
1Arctic Rose FarmDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,406,084
2Dennis Green & Sons PartnershipDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,230,009
3Sawmill Creek RanchDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,111,788
4Eagles' Ridge Community Church IncDelta Junction, AK 99737$956,779
5Pamela M RuleDelta Junction, AK 99737$895,913
6John M RobinsonDelta Junction, AK 99737$893,544
7Ronald J RobinsonDelta Junction, AK 99737$888,040
8Schultz Farms IncDelta Junction, AK 99737$801,619
9Scott W SchultzDelta Junction, AK 99737$781,550
10Marlene J RobinsonDelta Junction, AK 99737$764,511
11Michael A SchultzDelta Junction, AK 99737$648,401
12Stevens Village Ira CouncilStevens Village, AK 99774$636,717
13Dennis D. And Cleo V. Green RevocDelta Junction, AK 99737$600,250
14Theuringer FarmDelta Junction, AK 99737$552,435
15Brenda PetersonDelta Junction, AK 99737$449,027
16Coplee International IncKodiak, AK 99615$420,686
17Kent E SteeleDelta Junction, AK 99737$381,748
18Insanity AcresDelta Junction, AK 99737$380,089
19Ione K Strong Second TrustStockbridge, GA 30281$370,178
20Stephen P SorensenDelta Junction, AK 99737$321,257

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag