Farm Subsidy information
Arizona
Total Subsidies in Arizona, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,157
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Arizona totaled $127,211,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Marlatt Brothers | Wellton, AZ 85356 | $360,845 |
22 | Dakota Farms LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $354,715 |
23 | Arizona Organic Beans Lllp | Tucson, AZ 85737 | $353,673 |
24 | Crockett Apiaries LLC | Tempe, AZ 85282 | $353,151 |
25 | Post Farms | Marana, AZ 85653 | $328,892 |
26 | T-k Farms | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $326,957 |
27 | A & B Farms Partnership | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $317,351 |
28 | Sunset Farms General Partnership | Gila Bend, AZ 85337 | $314,894 |
29 | Lone Butte Partnership | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $312,573 |
30 | Lkh Farming An Arizona Gp | Ehrenberg, AZ 85334 | $311,857 |
31 | Doug Mellon Farms II Inc | Yuma, AZ 85364 | $308,115 |
32 | Joseph A Auza Sheep Co LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $307,083 |
33 | P R P Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $306,374 |
34 | Vip Farms | Thatcher, AZ 85552 | $302,571 |
35 | Nutrien Ag Solutions | Spanish Fort, AL 36527 | $300,000 |
36 | Vera Earl Ranch Inc | Sonoita, AZ 85637 | $296,996 |
37 | Schulz Farms, LLC | Tonopah, AZ 85354 | $293,103 |
38 | Hardison Farms II | Arlington, AZ 85322 | $286,863 |
39 | Burruel & Burruel Farms Ptshp | Marana, AZ 85653 | $284,369 |
40 | Ross Farms | Sedona, AZ 86336 | $283,755 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”