Farm Subsidy information
Arizona
Total Subsidies in Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 16,514
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Arizona totaled $2,372,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Bales & Bales II | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $5,387,878 |
| 42 | Bartlett & Bartlett Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $5,384,067 |
| 43 | Barkley Seed, Inc. | Yuma, AZ 85366 | $5,276,141 |
| 44 | Santa Maria Farms II 93 | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $5,275,175 |
| 45 | Marathon Farming Co Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85230 | $5,096,244 |
| 46 | Broken Wing Farms | Scottsdale, AZ 85260 | $4,971,172 |
| 47 | Carver Mountain Enterprises | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $4,962,835 |
| 48 | Arizona Grain Company | Casa Grande, AZ 85230 | $4,959,411 |
| 49 | Eagle Farms | Gilbert, AZ 85234 | $4,896,780 |
| 50 | Desert Conservation Farms | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $4,893,605 |
| 51 | Gin Ranch 94 | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $4,840,238 |
| 52 | Lone Butte Partnership | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $4,824,787 |
| 53 | Sunset Farms | Gila Bend, AZ 85337 | $4,788,542 |
| 54 | F & M Farms Baldenegro | Parker, AZ 85344 | $4,745,384 |
| 55 | Carmichael Farms 96 | Palo Verde, AZ 85343 | $4,740,142 |
| 56 | 4 B Farms | Phoenix, AZ 85008 | $4,534,484 |
| 57 | Cullison Farms | Wellton, AZ 85356 | $4,533,461 |
| 58 | Rg Howard Farms | Thatcher, AZ 85552 | $4,516,866 |
| 59 | Cockrill Bros Ptshp | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $4,508,804 |
| 60 | Buckelew Farms II Ptns | Parker, AZ 85344 | $4,465,293 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf