Market Gains in Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 279
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Arizona totaled $11,566,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Youngker & Youngker II 93 | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $66,570 |
42 | Legacy Farming Company | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $64,367 |
43 | Don Pew Farms | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $64,063 |
44 | Max Taylor & Co Dba Rainbow Fms | Phoenix, AZ 85018 | $62,974 |
45 | Hiscox Farms Gp | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $62,822 |
46 | Fifth Generation Farms | Avondale, AZ 85392 | $60,912 |
47 | Discovery West Ranches Partners | Phoenix, AZ 85037 | $59,699 |
48 | Jbj Koton General Partnership | Avondale, AZ 85323 | $59,110 |
49 | Kymmer Farms Inc | Chandler, AZ 85249 | $58,864 |
50 | Tierra Verde Farms Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $57,137 |
51 | Pace Farms | Chandler, AZ 85244 | $56,890 |
52 | J M J Farms | Thatcher, AZ 85552 | $56,407 |
53 | O & E Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $56,190 |
54 | Dorame Brothers Custom Hay | Blythe, CA 92226 | $56,078 |
55 | Vernon And Joyce Schulz Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $55,910 |
56 | Rg Howard Farms | Thatcher, AZ 85552 | $55,788 |
57 | Cullison Farms | Wellton, AZ 85356 | $55,693 |
58 | Martori Family General Partnershi | Scottsdale, AZ 85260 | $53,828 |
59 | Alcaida Farms | Parker, AZ 85344 | $53,748 |
60 | Gila Valley Farms L P | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $52,218 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”