Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Arizona, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 493
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Arizona totaled $17,555,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Flying R Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $105,308 |
42 | Mark D Smith Enterprises Inc | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $104,225 |
43 | Hardison Farms II | Arlington, AZ 85322 | $102,896 |
44 | Red Bullet Farms | Scottsdale, AZ 85260 | $102,726 |
45 | Double Anchor Farms | Scottsdale, AZ 85260 | $102,622 |
46 | Precision Farming | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $101,732 |
47 | Bales & Bales II | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $91,805 |
48 | Dust Boll Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $87,504 |
49 | S D Farms | Phoenix, AZ 85021 | $86,487 |
50 | Schulz Farms, LLC | Tonopah, AZ 85354 | $84,958 |
51 | Doug & Tina Dunlap Joint Venture | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $82,132 |
52 | Mohawk Valley Farms Gp | Roll, AZ 85347 | $81,270 |
53 | Ramona Enterprises LLC | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $80,554 |
54 | Rio Farming General Partnership | Chandler, AZ 85249 | $78,267 |
55 | Marlatt Brothers | Wellton, AZ 85356 | $77,467 |
56 | D Lamoreaux Farms II | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $77,212 |
57 | Sierra West Farms | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $75,522 |
58 | Nixon Cotton | Mesa, AZ 85206 | $75,224 |
59 | Carmichael Farms 96 | Palo Verde, AZ 85343 | $74,795 |
60 | Harrison Farms Family Partnership | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $73,253 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”