Total Disaster Programs in Coconino County, Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,650
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Coconino County, Arizona totaled $23,700,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bar T Bar Ranch Inc | Winslow, AZ 86047 | $1,522,732 |
2 | Manterola Sheep Co Inc | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $1,268,024 |
3 | Hopi Three Canyon Ranch LLC | Winslow, AZ 86047 | $1,263,651 |
4 | Flying M Ranch Lllp | Flagstaff, AZ 86002 | $1,216,029 |
5 | Joe Auza Sheep Co | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $858,342 |
6 | Joseph A Auza Sheep Co LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $719,062 |
7 | Mcnelly Ranches LLC | Williams, AZ 86046 | $687,968 |
8 | Cholla Livestock LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85028 | $662,956 |
9 | Jimmie L Shiew | Flagstaff, AZ 86003 | $620,224 |
10 | Curt A Wells | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $426,095 |
11 | Cataract Natural Reserve Lands LLC | Flagstaff, AZ 86002 | $414,842 |
12 | Babbitt Ranches LLC | Flagstaff, AZ 86002 | $382,795 |
13 | Logan Hefner | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $365,318 |
14 | Fletcher Land And Cattle LLC | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $344,684 |
15 | Jilmat Inc | Williams, AZ 86046 | $311,875 |
16 | 55 Ranch LLC | Buckeye, AZ 85396 | $282,004 |
17 | Dennis L Arp | Flagstaff, AZ 86005 | $275,667 |
18 | Nagiller & Sons Inc | Williams, AZ 86046 | $269,189 |
19 | Nancy Shiew | Paulden, AZ 86334 | $206,462 |
20 | Auza & Son Farms Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $172,370 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>