Farm Subsidy information
Gila County, Arizona
Total Subsidies in Gila County, Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 143
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Gila County, Arizona totaled $23,794,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | White Mountain Apache Tribe | Whiteriver, AZ 85941 | $1,460,017 |
| 2 | Point Of Pines Livestock Association | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $1,087,769 |
| 3 | Ash Creek Grazing Association | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $903,050 |
| 4 | John L Johnson | Young, AZ 85554 | $695,880 |
| 5 | Slaughter Mountain Livestock Association | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $548,085 |
| 6 | Griffin Cattle Ranch LLC | Globe, AZ 85502 | $539,193 |
| 7 | Anchor Seven Livestock Associatio | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $530,660 |
| 8 | R-100 Ranch | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $473,823 |
| 9 | Tonto Livestock Association | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $397,856 |
| 10 | Idt Cattle Association | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $356,232 |
| 11 | Tw Land And Livestock LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85014 | $238,617 |
| 12 | Daniel J Cooper | Young, AZ 85554 | $228,554 |
| 13 | Id Horse Program | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $188,524 |
| 14 | Fort Apache Restoration LLC | Fort Apache, AZ 85926 | $176,415 |
| 15 | Carrizo Livestock Association | Whiteriver, AZ 85941 | $170,515 |
| 16 | Erickson Family Trust | Paradise Valley, AZ 85253 | $166,203 |
| 17 | Arthur F Rivera | Claypool, AZ 85532 | $163,041 |
| 18 | North Fork Livestock Association | Whiteriver, AZ 85941 | $161,379 |
| 19 | M-lazy-s Cattle Company Inc | Young, AZ 85554 | $145,589 |
| 20 | J Bar B Cattle Co | Phoenix, AZ 85042 | $142,264 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf